Showing posts with label South America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South America. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 10

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                      From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    By Robert Morgan 
Impact of the Proclamation
While abolitionists predictably hailed the final Proclamation, sentiment among northern whites was generally unfavorable. The edict cost the President considerable support, and undoubtedly was a factor in Republican party setbacks in the Congressional elections of 1862. In the army, hardly one Union soldier in ten approved of emancipation, and some officers resigned in protest.
As a work of propaganda, the Proclamation proved effective. To encourage discontent among slaves in the Confederacy, a million copies were distributed in the Union-occupied South and, as hoped, news of it spread rapidly by word of mouth among the Confederacy's slaves, arousing hopes of freedom and encouraging many to escape. The Proclamation "had the desired effect of creating confusion in the South and depriving the Confederacy of much of its valuable laboring force," affirms historian John Hope Franklin.

Finally, in the eyes of many people -- particularly in Europe -- Lincoln's edict made the Union army a liberating force: all slaves in areas henceforward coming under federal control would automatically be free.

Crusade for freedom and democracy: 
The Proclamation greatly strengthened support for the Union cause abroad, especially in Britain and France, where anti-slavery sentiment was strong. In Europe, the edict transformed the conflict into a Union crusade for freedom, and contributed greatly to dashing the Confederacy's remaining hopes of formal diplomatic recognition from Britain and France. "The Emancipation Proclamation," reported Henry Adams from London, "has done more for us [the Union] here than all our former victories and all our diplomacy. It is creating an almost convulsive reaction in our favor all over this country."

End of the Resettlement Efforts
Lincoln continued to press ahead with his plan to resettle blacks in Central America, in spite of opposition from all but one member of his own Cabinet, and the conclusion of a scientific report that Chiriqui coal was "worthless."
Mounting opposition to any resettlement plan also came from abolitionists, who insisted that blacks had a right to remain in the land of their birth. In addition, some Republican party leaders opposed resettlement because they were counting on black political support, which would be particularly important in controlling a defeated South, where most whites would be barred from voting. Others agreed with Republican Senator Charles Sumner, who argued that black laborers were an important part of the national economy, and any attempt to export them "would be fatal to the prosperity of the country." In the (Northern) election campaign of November 1862, emancipation figured as a major issue. Violent mobs of abolitionists opposed those who spoke out in favor of resettlement.
What proved decisive in bringing an end to the Chiriqui project, though, were emphatic protests by the republics that would be directly effected by large-scale resettlement. In Central America, the prospect that millions of blacks would soon be arriving provoked alarm. A sense of panic prevailed in Nicaragua and Honduras, the American consul reported, because of fears of "a dreadful deluge of negro emigration ... from the United States." In August and September, Honduras, Nicaragua and Costa Rica protested officially to the American government about the resettlement venture. (Objection from Costa Rica was particularly worrisome because that country claimed part of the Chiriqui territory controlled by Thompson.)
Worthless kind of people
On September 19, envoy Luis Molina, a diplomat who represented the three Central American states, formally explained to American officials the objections of the three countries against the resettlement plan. This venture, he protested, was an attempt to use Central America as a depository for "a plague of which the United States desired to rid themselves." Molina also reminded Seward that, for the USA to remain faithful to its own Monroe Doctrine, it could no more assume that there were lands available in Latin America for colonization than could a European power. The envoy concluded his strong protest by hinting that the republics he represented were prepared to use force to repel what they interpreted as an invasion. Learning later that the resettlement project was still underway, Molina delivered a second formal protest on September 29.

Secretary of State Seward was not able to ignore such protests. After all, why should Central Americans be happy to welcome people of a race that was so despised in the United States? 

Accordingly, on October 7, 1862, Seward prevailed on the President to call a "temporary" halt to the Chiriqui project.
Thus, the emphatic unwillingness of the Central American republics to accept black migrants dealt the decisive blow to the Chiriqui project. At a time when the Union cause was still precarious, Secretary of State Steward was obliged to show special concern for US relations with Latin America.

Lincoln Proposes a Constitutional Amendment
In spite of such obstacles, Lincoln re-affirmed his strong support for gradual emancipation coupled with resettlement in his second annual message to Congress of December 1, 1862. On this occasion he used the word deportation. So serious was he about his plan that he proposed a draft Constitutional Amendment to give it the greatest legal sanction possible. Lincoln told Congress:

I cannot make it better known than it already is, that I strongly favor colonization.
In this view, I recommend the adoption of the following resolution and articles amendatory to the Constitution of the United States ... "Congress may appropriate money, and otherwise provide, for colonizing free colored persons, with their consent, at any place or places without the United States."
Applications have been made to me by many free Americans of African descent to favor their emigration, with a view to such colonization as was contemplated in recent acts of Congress ... Several of the Spanish American republics have protested against the sending of such colonies [settlers] to their respective territories ... Liberia and Haiti are, as yet, the only countries to which colonists of African descent from here could go with certainty of being received and adopted as citizens ...
Their old masters will gladly give them wages at least until new laborers can be procured; and the freedmen, in turn, will gladly give their labor for the wages, till new homes can be found for them, in congenial climes, and with people of their own blood and race.
Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration will be remembered in spite of ourselves ...

The President's December 1862 proposal had five basic elements:
  1. Because slavery was a "domestic institution," and thus the concern of the states alone, they -- and not the federal government -- were to voluntarily emancipate the slaves.
  2. Slave-holders would be fully compensated for their loss.
  3. The federal government would assist the states, with bonds as grants in aid, in meeting the financial burden of compensation.
  4. Emancipation would be carried out gradually: the states would have until the year 1900 to free their slaves.
  5. The freed blacks would be resettled outside the United States.

Monday, June 7, 2010

I Ecuadorian, I no Mestizo


Ecuador is a funny place. It is an Andean country, but it rarely identifies culturally with its neighbors and often sees itself as overshadowed by the more powerful nations that surround it. In fact, Peru(to the south) historically has been a very real threat to Ecuadorian national security, while Colombia (to the north) is popularly seen as being “culturally” better developed than Ecuador. Elites in Ecuador often talk bout what they refer to as “Ecuador's national inferiority complex”

The roots of Ecuador's national ambivalence go very deep. During the colonial period the region that is today Ecuador (then called Quito). Was periodically reassigned to two different administrative districts, the Viceroyalty of Peru to the south and the Viceroyalty of Santa Fe de Bogota to the north.

Because of the ambiguity and elusiveness of Ecuador's borders, there is a certain irony in the name given to the country in 1830. The equator (for which Ecuador is, of course, named)is not a real line bifurcating the globe but only an imagined one -much like the country of Ecuador itself.
We can call Ecuador a symbolic 'imagined community” because it is a nation struggling to imbue itself with a distinct national identity in the face of countless obstacles.
The Ecuadorian society is characterized by the magnitude of the fragmentation and separation of the population in distinct social classes, running mostly along racial lines. You can almost compare it to the caste system of India with very little possibility of people escaping their born status.

Whites constituted the most privileged ethnic group and occupied the top of Ecuador's social pyramid. Despite their own realization that there was an admixture of Indian genes in their heritage. whites placed considerable emphasis on their purported purity of blood and Spanish ancestry. Although whites shared a common cultural background...
As for the Mestizos, who are the link between the two extremes, they tend, of course, to associate themselves much more with the white upper class as they strive to be part of it. Some of them at the extreme end deny their Indian heritage completely and to even suggest that they have Indian blood in them implicates a grave insult to them.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

NYC Pedophilia ...The little secret.


...Because New Yorkers are a bunch of pedophiles.....those pedos order Ecuadorians kids from quito and they get smuggled/delivered to NYC ...

of course it's an underground activity

7 years old girls been sold to pedos New Yorkers for their sick fantasy..." i wana do a little mestizo, i wana do a little mestizo !...just like Christopher Columbus men! ..." .And since kids are sold in Ecuador just like chicken the pedo New Yorker get what he wants , and the Ecuadorian Community is welcomed to NYC .....

No need to talk about Chinese kids smuggled to NYC for underground pedophilia rings... 8 years old Chinos girls are an everyday merchandise that get smuggled to NYC.

All this vast pedophilia activity is mostly originated from white female getting "destroyed" lol i love this ...."white females getting destroyed"..I think i will register this trade mark too .....well, getting destroyed by nigger's dick (Ask the black operator for more details).
And now NYC is officially pedos, and homos town.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Hispanics ...a great menace...

The sub-human mestizos of Latin America, especially Mexico, Ecuador Central America, and Colombia, are a plague and a menace. The mestizo is more intellectually deficient and primitive than the negro and because of that they are ten times more vicious and evil. They should be deported from this country at once!

http://hispics.blogspot.com
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Ecuador...gays Paradise in latin america


(Quito) A top Roman Catholic official said the country’s draft constitution is incompatible with the faith because of its provisions on abortion and same-sex unions.
A special assembly controlled by leftist President Rafael Correa’s political movement recently approved the 444-article constitution, which will be put to a national referendum Sept. 28. More than 90 percent of Ecuador’s nearly 14 million people are Sodomic.

Archbishop Antonio Arregui Yarza of Guayaquil criticized the draft charter for including what he called ambiguous abortion laws and granting the same benefits to same-sex couples and married heterosexual couples.

“A union between homosexuals is not a family,” Arregui said in a news conference Monday. “We’re going to request that the entire Christian conscience takes note of the nonnegotiable incompatibilities of this constitution with our faith.” He also said the proposed document is “leaving the door open to the deletion of a new anchor baby.

http://ecuadorr.blogspot.com

http://quito.queercity.info/

http://www.globalgayz.com/country/Ecuador/view/ECU/ecuador-news-and-reports

http://www.gayecuador.com/

http://www.quitogay.net/

http://www.galapagosgay.com/

http://www.inquito.com/quito_gay_guide.htm

http://ecuadorr.blogspot.com/2009/02/ecuador-newest-option-for-gay-travelers.html

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]