Negros negative influence

The speculation about the enslaved spirit reigning over the Americans and as part of the American spirit, that is tending to disappear and to be replaced by the emerging, fast-growing, and resulting from the crossbreed and the invasion of Blacks in all aspects of American life. Those speculation are founded on solid facts, and they are proved true each day passing by, the ridiculous way Americans act, their gross appearance and the degree of their stupidity are just an explanation of the evil voir primitive spirit reigning in America,,, the partially evolved monkey is sure alive inside the Black race body, soul and spirit. It has been infesting all aspects of American life, from all the hierarchical levels.

Observing Negro behavior and physiology gives a great prove of the animal nature of Black people.

Negro apes comparison.

Negros poison the society and the milieu where they exist through their back warded and savage, almost animal like life style. Hearing "Slang Drugs" "Rob Dat Nigga" and” Fuck Bitches All night", will make the society sick in the head sooner or later. This kind of behavior is ingested in the mind of Americans through the so a la mode hip hop culture promoted by an media advocating the blacks integration and an all homogene/Black infested society, as a result the American mentality and culture is not only strongly influenced and manipulated by the presence of the Blacks in all the levels of the society, the overall American culture is derived from the black mentality and the hip hop culture, it’s like you can’t talk about American culture without invoking the hip hop and black culture, in fact that’s the culture that USA export to the world, that’s how America is represented worldwide.

Sure, watching institutions like MTV and BET present the Black race as successful. Melting in the society, a happy society, advocating that image by invoking a multiculturalism as a progression of the society, by the elites, has its reasons, often explained by the Right to the pursuit of happiness, Even if it means looking and acting like a jackass. Sure Negros influence on the society is beyond the natural achievement (vector)

But the reality of the Black race in the USA has nothing to do with the mainstream media, the black race is the dysfunctional member…etc

In real life the influence of Blacks on the society is more or less evident depending on the intensity of the exposition to Negro harm or like some wants to call it the Coontact, Negros are very influential and they change mentalities and attitudes, they infiltrate all the level of the society, from all backgrounds and ages, all, boosted by an media promoting Negros integration, and advocating Black people life style as an cultural revolution and often associating it with the American culture and identity, reminder America is a rootless culture, and the only civilization Americans know is the Europeans civilization, some talk about American culture as an perversion of the European one, as a result Negros behavior is very tolerated and often is associated with the American cultural revolution, typical Negro Behavior includes smoking crack, robbing, raping, murdering, crotch grabbing, staying unemployed, It also includes breeding in excessive level, to get more welfare, and it’s often an investment than an parenthood.

Slavery ended in 1865, followed by Reconstruction, which ended in 1877. Freed slaves, who had spent their lives being told what to do and were conditioned to react rather than initiate thought, were left to their own devices to face “freedom”. African American scholar Michael Eric Dyson states, “The effect of slavery continues to exert its brutal influence in the untold sufferings of millions of everyday folk”. He continues by saying that slavery is responsible for the high level of black residential separation from Whites today.

In “The Ethnic Myth”, Stephen Steinberg writes, “ghettos are nothing less than the shameful residue of slavery.” Many scholars blame slavery for the pathologies in the Black community such as homelessness, single-parent households, and youth violence. Views that are more radical claim, “Slavery is a constant reminder of what whites in America might do.” There is a belief that slavery stole their African culture.

While these arguments have merit, there are equally strong arguments that say that the opposite is true and camaraderie is a direct result of slavery. This segment of the population argues that African heritage was passed on, through the generations as one form of rebellion against the oppression brought on by slavery. These scholars would say that the Black culture today is a blend of African and European influences, compounded with the adaptations necessitated by slavery, resulting in a rich culture of religion, music, family, and art. It is a fact that African American culture has influenced White culture in many ways.

It cannot be disputed that slavery has affected the American culture today, both Black and White. The dispute remains on defining that effect and how to address this issue.

One of the important cultural invasions of Blacks or African Americans is the RAP music. Rap has rotted Americans' brains. Negros have destroyed all moral accountability. Negro always talking about "all da bitches wantz muh dik" and how he "treet dem bitchez" and all that other Negro nonsense, in fact it’s solidly founded on historical and todays facts, the fascination of white females with the black males trace its roots back to the slavery time and sexual encounters started in the plantations long before the “so called” Emancipation” today, interracial sex, is a life style and an bedrock in the American infrastructure.

As a result a new social category been implanted in the American society texture, it’s the Negros friendly, the Negros lovers aka the coalburners, and as an extreme cultural influences the Wiggers.

Wigger is a pejorative slang term for a white person who emulates mannerisms, language, and fashions associated with African-American culture, particularly hip hop culture. The term is considered derogatory, reflecting stereotypes of African Americans.

Wiggers are considered by some sarcasms as a new evolutionary specie: (Homo Sapien Niganderthal Whitus), their mating habits, their survival strategies, and their urban and suburban habitats are specific to their kind.

The highest living standard and most happiness Negros have ever achieved was when they were slaves in the old south. They had everything taken care of for them, suitable quarters to live in, three square meals every day, and someone to watch over them. Life was good and many Negro ex-slaves said so when they were interviewed many years ago. Slavery wasn't like it is portrayed in the movies. Slaves were very expensive, and their owners knew that to get the most work out of them, they would have to treat them decently and make sure they were healthy and reasonably happy. Otherwise, they would run off or try to kill their owners.

Negros need to have enough brain cells to comprehend their utter inferiority to Whites and realize just how worthless, destructive, and ignorant they really are. Upon realizing this, they can either drown themselves in booze, drugs, and criminality, or become uppity Negros.

Today, most of Americans mentality is just an deformed mirror reflect of Negros typical behavior, the Wiggermania is spreading, the Negros friendly, lovers and the coalburners are taking over by thousands, cross breeding with Negros make the hybrid specie sliding to the majority in the demographic sheme, what they have in common; they have enough Negros blood, genes and influence in them to guarantees an eminent chaos and anarchy in the future.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 5

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                                              From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          By Robert Morgan

Inauguration

Abraham Lincoln took the oath as President on March 4, 1861. Among the first words of his Inaugural Address was a pledge (repeating words from an August 1858 speech) intended to placate Southern apprehensions: 

"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." 

Referring to the proposed Crittenden amendment, which would make explicit constitutional protection of slavery where it already existed, he said, "I have no objection to its being made express, and irrevocable." He also promised to support legislation for the capture and return of runaway slaves.

At the same time, though, Lincoln emphasized that "no state, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the Union." With regard to those states that already proclaimed their secession from the Union, he said:

I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the states. Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part; and I shall perform it, so far as practicable, unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means, or, in some authoritative manner, direct the contrary.

Slavery and race: defining each other.

In his masterful multi-volume study of the background and course of the Civil War, American historian Allan Nevins attempted to identify the conflict's principle underlying cause.

The main root of the conflict (and there were minor roots) was the problem of slavery with its complementary problem of race-adjustment; the main source of the tragedy was the refusal of either section to face these conjoined problems squarely and pay the heavy costs of a peaceful settlement. Had it not been for the difference in race, the slavery issue would have presented no great difficulties. But as the racial gulf existed, the South inarticulately but clearly perceived that elimination of this issue would still leave it the terrible problem of the Negro ...

A heavy responsibility for the failure of America in this period rests with this Southern leadership, which lacked imagination, ability, and courage. But the North was by no means without its full share, for the North equally refused to give a constructive examination to the central question of slavery as linked with race adjustment. This was because of two principal reasons. Most abolitionists and many other sentimental-minded Northerners simply denied that the problem existed. Regarding all Negroes as white men with dark skins, whom a few years of schooling would bring abreast of the dominant race, they thought that no difficult adjustment was required. A much more numerous body of Northerners would have granted that a great and terrible task of race adjustment existed -- but they were reluctant to help shoulder any part of it ... Indiana, Illinois and even Kansas were unwilling to take a single additional person of color.

Outbreak of War

Dramatic events were swiftly creating enormous problems for the new President, who had greatly underestimated the depth of secessionist feeling in the South. In January and early February, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas followed South Carolina's example and left the Union. Florida troops fired on the federal stronghold of Fort Pickens. When South Carolina seceded, she claimed as rightfully hers all US government property within her borders, including federal forts and arsenals. While announcing a willingness to pay the federal government for at least a share of the cost of improvements it had made, South Carolina insisted that these properties belonged to the state, and would no longer tolerate the presence of a "foreign" power upon her soil. The other newly-seceding states took the same position.

On the day Lincoln took the presidential oath, the federal government still controlled four forts inside the new Confederacy. In Florida there were Forts Taylor, Jefferson, and Pickens, the first two of which seemed secure, while in South Carolina there was Fort Sumter, which was almost entirely encircled by hostile forces.

 Lincoln: Struggle to save the Union

While historians do not agree whether Lincoln deliberately sought to provoke an attack by his decision to re-supply the Fort, it is known that on April 9, while the bombardment of the stronghold was underway, the new President received a delegation of Virginia Unionists at the White House. Lincoln reminded them of his inaugural pledge that there would be "no invasion -- not using force," beyond what was necessary to hold federal government sites and to collect customs duties. "But if, as now appeared to be true, an unprovoked assault has been made upon Fort Sumter, I shall hold myself at liberty to repossess, if I can, like places which have been seized before the Government was devolved upon me."

In the aftermath of the Confederate seizure of Fort Sumter in mid-April, Lincoln called upon the states to provide 75,000 soldiers to put down the rebellion. Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas and North Carolina responded by leaving the Union and joining the newly-formed "Confederate States of America." This increased the size of the Confederacy by a third, and almost doubled its population and economic resources. Remaining with the Union, though, were four slave-holding border states -- Delaware, Missouri, Maryland and Kentucky -- and, predictably, the slave-holding District of Columbia.

The American Civil War of 1861-1865 -- or the "War Between the States," as many Southerners call it -- eventually claimed the lives of 360,000 in the Union forces, and an estimated 258,000 among the Confederates, in addition to hundreds of thousands of maimed and wounded. It was by far the most destructive war in American history.

North against South: a War for slavery...and Statehood.

Even after fighting began in earnest, Lincoln stuck to his long-held position on the slavery issue by countermanding orders by Union generals to free slaves. In July 1861, General John C. Fr�mont -- the Republican party's unsuccessful 1856 Presidential candidate -- declared martial law in Missouri, and announced that all slaves of owners in the state who opposed the Union were free. President Lincoln immediately canceled the order. Because the Southern states no longer sent representatives to Washington, abolitionists and radical Republicans wielded exceptional power in Congress, which responded to Lincoln's cancellation of Främont's order by passing, on August 6, 1861, the (first) Confiscation Act. It provided that any property, including slaves, used with the owner's consent in aiding and abetting insurrection against the United States, was the lawful subject of prize and capture wherever found.

In May 1862, Union General David Hunter issued an order declaring all slaves in Georgia, Florida and South Carolina to be free. Lincoln promptly revoked the order. An irate Congress responded by passing, in July, a second Confiscation Act that declared "forever free" all slaves whose owners were in rebellion, whether or not the slaves were used for military purposes. Lincoln refused to sign the Act until it was amended, stating he thought it an unconditional bill of attainder. Although he did not veto the amended law, Lincoln expressed his dissatisfaction with it. Furthermore, he did not faithfully enforce either of the Confiscation Acts.

Deaths in Union 'Contraband Camps'

Slaves seized under the Confiscation Acts, as well as runaway slaves who turned themselves into Union forces, were held in so-called "contraband" camps. In his message to the Confederate Congress in the fall of 1863, President Jefferson Davis sharply criticized Union treatment of these blacks. After describing the starvation and suffering in these camps, he said: "There is little hazard in predicting that in all localities where the enemy have a temporary foothold, the Negroes, who under our care increased sixfold ... will have been reduced by mortality during the war to no more than one-half their previous number." However exaggerated Davis' words may have been, it remains a grim fact that many blacks lost their lives in these internment camps, and considerably more suffered terribly as victims of hunger, exposure and neglect. In 1864, one Union officer called the death rate in these camps "frightful," and said that "most competent judges place it as no less than twenty-five percent in the last two years."