A global petting system is replacing naturel selection: Imminent Doom

Humans are Silent, While getting Replaced

There is no doubt that the recent waves of mass immigration and populations movements are of a biblical scale, this makes the jews' mass expelling from nation after nation throughout history a walk in a park, maybe walking a dog or something like that to not use the saying in the sense that expelling Jews was an easy task, but the overall idea is that the locals, modern humans populations, must be afraid, very afraid, for what the future is holding for them, they may be the ones getting expelled from their land to make it even for Jews oppressed history, already the rights of foreigners is sacred for a ZOG, and often they are given priority over the locals, all the statistics point to a certain Take Over of colored populations, or what is called minorities in no time, ultimately they are replacing humans, that's visible to the naked eye in the UK, major parts of Europe and the  US, Canada and Australia as well. 

After Negros invasion, while Africans are still pouring in in masses, now it is Semitic races turn, Indians are overpopulating like rats, they are a rodent invasive species that must be exterminated as cricket, they are highly intrusive and often mistaken for some brown humans while they are not, it is an ancient hominins improved by modern humans genes and hosting a totally Evil Spirit dating to the struggle between Adam, Eve, and Serpent seed. Indians existence in human milieux, in a nutshell, are Ashkenazi Jews in terms of the way they pass for White, Indians pass for Brown humans while they are not, the difference is that Ashkenazi Jews existed around humans, so there was some control on how Evil they can be, they even invented a religion, controversical mais bon, (not technically, but they have control of religious institutions). Indians on contrast are existing in their own shit hole demons infested land, where they worship cows, eat their poop, and have all kind of weird beliefs, they may be an ancient civilization, evil is not born yesterday.

Neverever the world populations looked so diversified, the locals marginalized and every national identity vanished and replaced by a Zionist occupied globalist government preaching all kinds of none sense of deviations as a norme and discarding every national identity, integrity or loyalty to the land and the locals, because they are foreigners themselves, few generations immigrants, or ancient populations of Jews that settled down in humans milieu a long time ago and had access to key positions, politicians in the West have no loyalty to the locals who voted them in, the legitimate owner of the land, the people who sweat blood after WWII, wich is caused by Jews bitterness for their oppressed history, to build the infrastructure, the civilization, the economy, and make the resources available, to be freely given to illegal invaders who destroy everything and uproot the locals' culture, just because Zionism controls the institutions and it aims to dilute the planet's populations, so nobody will pay attention to the existence of this Evil form of life around humans.

Global immigration: Hominins are still struggling for resources 

Those people are pouring in millions into prosperous nations, sometimes it seems that they are somehow telepathically connected in a mission to invade modern humans milieus, the overall scheme is the same, advance any argument of humanitarian nature, play the victim of events or circumstances, profit from the empathy of the locals and drown them in numbers, those people have a feeling of self-entitlement so deep that the locals, brainwashed by Zionists agents in key position, ended up passing the welfare of foreigners before their own.

The "locals", took centuries to build their nations, civilization and infrastructure into an reflection of the amazing mind of modern humans and its capabilities, while the 'invaders' often, are coming from a less advanced societies often reflecting the mind of less evolved human beings, which explains the development of this feeling of empathy or selfentitlement worldwide, like as you feel the moral obligation to care for your pet, because its a poor living creature that may perish without humans care. the comparison is extreme, but that's the overall idea, those people aren't trying to be selfsufficient, build their nations same as modern humans done, as soon as they are the victim of an attempted armed robbery, they cry oppression and ask for asylum, while life is is a struggle worldwide, some may be really surviving harsh conditions, but its often the consequences of their corrupted leaders, and it's their responsibility to build their nations, that's why Trump was right in cutting aids to countries who does nothing to curb illegal immigrations. 

Those people are searching for the easy way, while the locals passed through hell to build their nations into what it today, before the Zionist agents took control and opened the door to this destructive demographic invasion.

Those people take advantage of immigration laws and international conventions to flood industrialized nations, instead of building their own, perhaps its due to their partially evolved state, they advance the pretext of major events that are affecting a minority of them to flood the host country, it is more of an economic gain motivated immigration than humanitarian emergency, those people are seeking to live on industrialized nations social security systems rather than to be a self sufficient 'human being', as cited before its due to their nature of partially evolved beans, after all that's why they didn't evolve, and now trying to profit from the global petting program going on worldwide, developed and carred for by Jews to avoid any scenario of Nazi Germany era. 

People are struggling worldwide, that's how humans evolve, Europe was in rubbles after WW2, yet, Europeans didn't seek refuge in another land, they struggle and built the continent into what is today, Russia, suffered a major loss in last global War, yet built a major power, either in Soviet Union or Putin era, the US, went through a devastating Civil War, yet they built a powerful industrialized nation, even Asian nations built outstanding civilization after suffering major wars, including the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. So why are these people unable to see further than their flat nose and seek to live on others' wealth? Easy, they didn't evolve enough to try to be self-sufficient; they will go extinct, same as Neanderthals, without modern humans' assistance.

They complain about harsh conditions and poverty, yet when they come to America for example they live better than poor American Negros for example, in Europe, the same scenario may be repeated under some circumstances. So, why the American Negros dont complain about harsh conditions and poverty and try to seek Asylum somewhere else or even demand their independence from federal government? easy, they know they can't be self-sufficient without Whites managing the resources, so for them, that little public assistance is a matter of life or death, or extinction.

The separation of church and state going one way

The push for mass immigration and open borders is known to be a routine preaching in left-infested political and religious institutions,  often justidied by humanitarian reasons, in terms of helping oppressed and needy people because the holy texts ordered us to do good, they even insinuate that borders must be abolished, and people should be able to move freely because those people are fellow human beans (apparently the separation of Church and State is a one way amendment, they don't want the government to mind religious businesses but they do), Satan sounded a humanitarian as well when he offered the forbidden Fruit to Eve (metaphorically speaking).

There is nothing Divine or sacred in encouraging and pushing for this type of populations movement, necessarily on a larger and global scale, while the Quran and the Bible both preached to help the needy, they are talking about the elements deprived in society, the elderly, the disabled, orphans... Not millions of strangers, military age males, organized into a demographic invasion. I'm not sure what Torah is talking about, maybe orchestrating that type of "modern-day pilgrims" to get revenge for being expelled from many nations throughout history, and punish the goyim for their sins.

Mexico is now colonising America and imposing its language and culture. Though the Americans still have the strength of understanding to recognise that the Hispanic invasion should be stopped, they are unable to take the measures required to achieve this end. The very least that must be done to halt the Hispanic invasion is the mass enslavement, or execution, of the invaders, which must be followed by an American invasion of Mexico to enforce American language and values upon the Mexicans. But the citizens of the USA recoil from such ruthless violence (see 'the communal attitude to violence') and instead embrace delusion. They pretend their futile defence is not folly, ignore the slow but inevitable takeover of their country and persecute anyone who tries to dispel their illusions. America has lost its ability to defend itself and must eventually be overrun by people from other cultures.

The sacred natural order that must never be transgressed

Natural selection is what caused life to happen on Earth, survival of the fittest caused the extinction of weaker kinds and the strong (more evolved ) survived and thrived to create human civilizations, this principle is still enforced in modern history, we can easily see examples on how the evolutionary stage dictates the degree of a prosperity of a nation or a geographic location.

We will put this in the context of the ability of populations to rebuild their nation or civilization after a catastrophic event causing major destruction, Japanese they built their country into a leading industrialized nation at a record time after the devastating bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they have the highest IQ in the world, the Koreas, both North and South built an industrialized power house un the south and an impressive military power at the north, despite total isolation and sanctions, Germany post-war industrialisation happened in no time to be a leading power in Europe, Russia despite the turmoil of the Cold War transitioned from the Soviet Union to Soviet Russia and prospered into economic sufficiency despite being literally sanctioned from all fronts.

Those examples illustrate that natural selection is still prevailing and populations with modern humans' potential can overcome all the constraints, including total nuclear annihilation.

To simplify we will put the degree of development in a context of North vs South,  Russia suffered huge losses post WWII, and now is the most powerful nuclear power and is thriving economically despite sanctions, relative isolation from the West, and their hostile attitude; on the other hand Africa is and was always backwarded despite all the aids the continent is receiving. It seems that Africans are more inclined to live on human nations' social security systems than develop their continent, after the US and the EU, both failed into making Africans self-sufficient or to build the continent into a human civilization, after receiving limitless aids, since they are morally corrupted and mentally defaillant, after pouring in the West in millions and 'Culturally Enrished' literally every Western capital, now they cry colonization, and their next feeding corpses is Russia, it seems that Putin is not paying attention to the real nature of those people, he seems to be totally inclined into investing in a dead cause, those people are Evil, and many meeting with them may have altered Putin's vision, total Evil can influence people, even powerful leaders, Putin is a Human being after all.

This remark may be simply explained by the evolutionary gap between human kinds, Africans are often associated with the characteristics of the less evolved of humans, even going into saying they represent the incarnation of Homo Erectus at an improved stage in modern days isn't an exaggeration. The pure African race before mixing with modern humans is a primitive form of life, evolution is explained simply by leaving Africa and confronting more challenging environments and constraints, it is agreed that it happened from South to North, the out-of-Africa event that caused the evolution of Homo Sapiens or modern humans. 

Observing the overall planet, in terms of climates and degree of development, Russia and some Scandinavian nations in general, is the coldest country in the world, Russians are stereotyped as being robust and above average intelligence, judging by their overall civilizational development, not by the existence of some Semitic races scattered all around the vast Russian territory. Does that mean Russians are more evolved than all humans on the planet, since they are inhabiting the extreme north of the planet? That's why Semitic races, partially evolved populations, and Zionism hate their racial purity so much.

While Africans present evident signs of an evolutionary gap, either by the overall state of Africa or by the way they 'Culturally enriches' white milieus, Semitic races present an genetical inferiority to modern humans as well, without being as backwarded as Africans, they are wicked, learned how to coexist and deceive humans after gaining their sympathy, they coexisted with modern humans since Neanderthals met Homo Sapiens, but instead of exterminating this form of life that didn't suppose to exist, because they were an intermediate evolutionary stage,  they cross bred with them, which was what the metaphor of the original sin and serpent seed is about, giving them a ride to today demographics by hijacking modern humans genome to present what is known as the significant inheritance of archaic genes well documented in some of today's worlds populations.

Semitic races are more advanced than Africans because they always existed around modern humans, that's why Native Americans were backwarded as well upon their discovery by Europeans, now we have the Mestizos populations, competing modern humans and taking their jobs, and that's why Ashkenazi Jews are the more advanced for of Semitic races, they diluted their archaic genes in modern humans genome, everything is about evolution and Genetics, borders are disapearing and bonding is happening between humans kinds.

The serpent seed doctrine wasn't a vain warning.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 11 and last.

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                      From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    By Robert Morgan 

The 'Ile à Vache' Project

With the collapse of the Chiriqui plan, Lincoln next gave serious consideration to a small Caribbean island off the coast of the black republic of Haiti, Ile à Vache, as a possible resettlement site for freed blacks.

In December 1862, the President signed a contract with Bernard Kock, a businessman who said that he had obtained a long-term lease on the island. Kock agreed to settle 5,000 blacks on the island, and to provide them with housing, food, medicine, churches, schools, and employment, at a cost to the government of $50 each. About 450 blacks were accordingly transported to the island at federal government expense, but the project was not a success. As a result of poor organization, corruption, and Haitian government opposition, about a hundred of the deportees soon died of disease, thirst and starvation. In February-March 1864, a government-chartered ship brought the survivors back to the United States. After that, Congress canceled all funds it had set aside for black resettlement.

End of Resettlement Efforts

In early 1863, Lincoln discussed with his Register of the Treasury a plan to "remove the whole colored race of the slave states into Texas." Apparently nothing came of the discussion.

Hard-pressed by the demands of the war situation, and lacking a suitable resettlement site or even strong support within his own inner circle, Lincoln apparently gave up on specific resettlement efforts. On July 1, 1864, presidential secretary John Hay wrote in his diary: "I am happy that the President has sloughed off that idea of colonization."

Whatever its merits, the notion that America's racial question could be solved by massive resettlement of the black population probably never had much realistic prospect of success, given the realities of American life. Writing in The Journal of Negro History, historian Paul Scheips summed up:

... Large-scale colonization of Negroes could only have succeeded, if it could have succeeded at all, if the Nation had been willing to make the gigantic propaganda, diplomatic, administrative, transportation and financial effort that would have been required. As it was, according to [historian Carl] Sandburg, "in a way, nobody cared." But even had hundreds of thousands of Negroes been colonized, the Nation's race problem would not have been solved.

Abolishing Slavery

A Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which would prohibit slavery throughout the United States, was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864. Because the House failed immediately to approve it with the necessary two-thirds majority vote, Lincoln, in his Annual Message of December 6, asked the House to reconsider it. On January 31, 1865, and with three votes to spare, the House approved it. By this time, slavery had already been abolished in Arkansas, Louisiana, Maryland and Missouri, and a similar move seemed imminent in Tennessee and Kentucky.

On February 3, 1865, Lincoln and Secretary of State Seward met with a Confederate peace delegation that included Confederate Vice President Stephens. Lincoln told the delegation that he still favored compensation to owners of emancipated slaves. It had never been his intention, the President said, to interfere with slavery in the states; he had been driven to it by necessity. He believed that the people of the North and South were equally responsible for slavery. If hostilities ceased and the states voluntarily abolished slavery, he believed, the government would indemnify the owners to the extent, possibly, of $400 million. Although the conference was not fruitful, two days later Lincoln presented to his cabinet a proposal to appropriate $400 million for reimbursement to slave owners, providing hostilities stopped by April 1. (The cabinet unanimously rejected the proposal, which Lincoln then regretfully abandoned.)

On April 9, General Lee surrendered his army to General Grant at Appomatox Courthouse, and by the end of May, all fighting had ceased. The Civil War was over.

Lincoln's Fear of 'Race War'

A short time before his death on April 15, 1865, Lincoln met with General Benjamin F. Butler, who reported that the President spoke to him of "exporting" the blacks.

"But what shall we do with the negroes after they are free?," Lincoln said. "I can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes ... I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country with a good climate, which they could have to themselves." Along with a request to Butler to look into the question of how best to use "our very large navy" to send "the blacks away," the President laid bare his fears for the future:

If these black soldiers of ours go back to the South, I am afraid that they will be but little better off with their masters than they were before, and yet they will be free men. I fear a race war, and it will be at least a guerilla war because we have taught these men how to fight ... There are plenty of men in the North who will furnish the negroes with arms if there is any oppression of them by their late masters.

To his dying day, it appears, Lincoln did not believe that harmony between white and black was feasible, and viewed resettlement of the blacks as the preferable alternative to race conflict. " ... Although Lincoln believed in the destruction of slavery," concludes black historian Charles Wesley (in an article in The Journal of Negro History), "he desired the complete separation of the whites and blacks. Throughout his political career, Lincoln persisted in believing in the colonization of the Negro."

Lincoln's perception of  the racial reality of America

Frederick Douglass, a gifted African American writer and activist who knew Lincoln, characterized him in a speech delivered in 1876:

In his interest, in his association, in his habits of thought, and in his prejudices, he was a white man. He was preeminently the white man's President, entirely devoted to the welfare of the white man. He was ready and willing at any time during the first years of his administration to deny, postpone, and sacrifice the rights of humanity in the colored people, to promote the welfare of the white people of this country.

Allan Nevins, one of this century's most prolific and acclaimed historians of US history, summed up Lincoln's view of the complex issue of race, and his vision of America's future:

His conception ran beyond the mere liberation of four million colored folks; it implied a far-reaching alteration of American society, industry, and government. A gradual planned emancipation, a concomitant transportation of hundreds of thousands and perhaps even millions of people overseas, a careful governmental nursing of the new colonies, and a payment of unprecedented sums to the section thus deprived of its old labor supply -- this scheme carried unprecedented implications.

To put this into effect would immensely increase the power of the national government and widen its abilities. If even partially practicable, it would mean a long step toward rendering the American people homogeneous in color and race, a rapid stimulation of immigration to replace the workers exported, a greater world position for the republic, and a pervasive change in popular outlook and ideas. The attempt would do more to convert the unorganized country into an organized nation than anything yet planned. Impossible, and undesirable even if possible? -- probably; but Lincoln continued to hold to his vision.

For most Americans today, Lincoln's plan to "solve" America's vexing racial problem by resettling the blacks in a foreign country probably seems bizarre and utterly impractical, if not outrageous and cruel. At the same time, though, and particularly when considered in the context of the terrible Civil War that cost so many lives, it is worth pondering just why and how such a far-fetched plan was ever able to win the support of a leader of the stature and wisdom of Abraham Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 5

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                                              From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          By Robert Morgan

Inauguration

Abraham Lincoln took the oath as President on March 4, 1861. Among the first words of his Inaugural Address was a pledge (repeating words from an August 1858 speech) intended to placate Southern apprehensions: 

"I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so." 

Referring to the proposed Crittenden amendment, which would make explicit constitutional protection of slavery where it already existed, he said, "I have no objection to its being made express, and irrevocable." He also promised to support legislation for the capture and return of runaway slaves.

At the same time, though, Lincoln emphasized that "no state, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the Union." With regard to those states that already proclaimed their secession from the Union, he said:

I shall take care, as the Constitution itself expressly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the states. Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part; and I shall perform it, so far as practicable, unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means, or, in some authoritative manner, direct the contrary.

Slavery and race: defining each other.

In his masterful multi-volume study of the background and course of the Civil War, American historian Allan Nevins attempted to identify the conflict's principle underlying cause.

The main root of the conflict (and there were minor roots) was the problem of slavery with its complementary problem of race-adjustment; the main source of the tragedy was the refusal of either section to face these conjoined problems squarely and pay the heavy costs of a peaceful settlement. Had it not been for the difference in race, the slavery issue would have presented no great difficulties. But as the racial gulf existed, the South inarticulately but clearly perceived that elimination of this issue would still leave it the terrible problem of the Negro ...

A heavy responsibility for the failure of America in this period rests with this Southern leadership, which lacked imagination, ability, and courage. But the North was by no means without its full share, for the North equally refused to give a constructive examination to the central question of slavery as linked with race adjustment. This was because of two principal reasons. Most abolitionists and many other sentimental-minded Northerners simply denied that the problem existed. Regarding all Negroes as white men with dark skins, whom a few years of schooling would bring abreast of the dominant race, they thought that no difficult adjustment was required. A much more numerous body of Northerners would have granted that a great and terrible task of race adjustment existed -- but they were reluctant to help shoulder any part of it ... Indiana, Illinois and even Kansas were unwilling to take a single additional person of color.

Outbreak of War

Dramatic events were swiftly creating enormous problems for the new President, who had greatly underestimated the depth of secessionist feeling in the South. In January and early February, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas followed South Carolina's example and left the Union. Florida troops fired on the federal stronghold of Fort Pickens. When South Carolina seceded, she claimed as rightfully hers all US government property within her borders, including federal forts and arsenals. While announcing a willingness to pay the federal government for at least a share of the cost of improvements it had made, South Carolina insisted that these properties belonged to the state, and would no longer tolerate the presence of a "foreign" power upon her soil. The other newly-seceding states took the same position.

On the day Lincoln took the presidential oath, the federal government still controlled four forts inside the new Confederacy. In Florida there were Forts Taylor, Jefferson, and Pickens, the first two of which seemed secure, while in South Carolina there was Fort Sumter, which was almost entirely encircled by hostile forces.

 Lincoln: Struggle to save the Union

While historians do not agree whether Lincoln deliberately sought to provoke an attack by his decision to re-supply the Fort, it is known that on April 9, while the bombardment of the stronghold was underway, the new President received a delegation of Virginia Unionists at the White House. Lincoln reminded them of his inaugural pledge that there would be "no invasion -- not using force," beyond what was necessary to hold federal government sites and to collect customs duties. "But if, as now appeared to be true, an unprovoked assault has been made upon Fort Sumter, I shall hold myself at liberty to repossess, if I can, like places which have been seized before the Government was devolved upon me."

In the aftermath of the Confederate seizure of Fort Sumter in mid-April, Lincoln called upon the states to provide 75,000 soldiers to put down the rebellion. Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas and North Carolina responded by leaving the Union and joining the newly-formed "Confederate States of America." This increased the size of the Confederacy by a third, and almost doubled its population and economic resources. Remaining with the Union, though, were four slave-holding border states -- Delaware, Missouri, Maryland and Kentucky -- and, predictably, the slave-holding District of Columbia.

The American Civil War of 1861-1865 -- or the "War Between the States," as many Southerners call it -- eventually claimed the lives of 360,000 in the Union forces, and an estimated 258,000 among the Confederates, in addition to hundreds of thousands of maimed and wounded. It was by far the most destructive war in American history.

North against South: a War for slavery...and Statehood.

Even after fighting began in earnest, Lincoln stuck to his long-held position on the slavery issue by countermanding orders by Union generals to free slaves. In July 1861, General John C. Fr�mont -- the Republican party's unsuccessful 1856 Presidential candidate -- declared martial law in Missouri, and announced that all slaves of owners in the state who opposed the Union were free. President Lincoln immediately canceled the order. Because the Southern states no longer sent representatives to Washington, abolitionists and radical Republicans wielded exceptional power in Congress, which responded to Lincoln's cancellation of Främont's order by passing, on August 6, 1861, the (first) Confiscation Act. It provided that any property, including slaves, used with the owner's consent in aiding and abetting insurrection against the United States, was the lawful subject of prize and capture wherever found.

In May 1862, Union General David Hunter issued an order declaring all slaves in Georgia, Florida and South Carolina to be free. Lincoln promptly revoked the order. An irate Congress responded by passing, in July, a second Confiscation Act that declared "forever free" all slaves whose owners were in rebellion, whether or not the slaves were used for military purposes. Lincoln refused to sign the Act until it was amended, stating he thought it an unconditional bill of attainder. Although he did not veto the amended law, Lincoln expressed his dissatisfaction with it. Furthermore, he did not faithfully enforce either of the Confiscation Acts.

Deaths in Union 'Contraband Camps'

Slaves seized under the Confiscation Acts, as well as runaway slaves who turned themselves into Union forces, were held in so-called "contraband" camps. In his message to the Confederate Congress in the fall of 1863, President Jefferson Davis sharply criticized Union treatment of these blacks. After describing the starvation and suffering in these camps, he said: "There is little hazard in predicting that in all localities where the enemy have a temporary foothold, the Negroes, who under our care increased sixfold ... will have been reduced by mortality during the war to no more than one-half their previous number." However exaggerated Davis' words may have been, it remains a grim fact that many blacks lost their lives in these internment camps, and considerably more suffered terribly as victims of hunger, exposure and neglect. In 1864, one Union officer called the death rate in these camps "frightful," and said that "most competent judges place it as no less than twenty-five percent in the last two years."