From anonymous source on the web: all credit to the original author
Face the facts, Negros, your race is a failed race because you’re a feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never figured out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling families. Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without exception did – they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas of property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes to coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history, or rather civilization.
But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem- solving have never been the black man’s strengths, have they? Did they invent a long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever build a city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there’s no Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move the slabs of rock – clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more than 20 Negros normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope. Did they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a written language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they curious enough about what layout across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.
In the United States there is a feeling of remorse among the citizens of the deep south about losing the Civil War. In many southern states you can still buy artifacts, memorabilia, confederate money etc. Memorials have been built with faces carved in stone similar to Mount Rushmore, i.e. Stone Mountain Georgia.
In Mexico there is an elite class of over 1,000 families who control most of the wealth. I think it would be naive to believe, that in a corrupt nation like Mexico, they have forgotten or forgiven the United States for the Mexican-American war.
Mexico is approaching us in a passive-aggressive way abetting millions of their poorest citizens to set up camp in our country, depleting our entitlement system with ex-patriots who refuse to speak English and much more...
Please read on.
Destroying America
Dick Lamm served as the Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. In 2005 there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Davis Hansen talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal - was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America . The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States . He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'
"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: "FIRST, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on: SECOND, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
THIRD, "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together." Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."
"FOURTH, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."
"My FIFTH point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."
"My SIXTH plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common Language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" --From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, SEVENTH, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said,. "Lastly, EIGHTH, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book "Mexifornia." His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."
Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path especially The American Dream.
In his 1960 exploration of eastern mysticism, The Lotus and the Robot, Arthur Koestler compared the smell of Bombay to that of “a wet smelly diaper” wrapped around his head. Four years later, VS Naipaul was so revulsed about the filth in India that he wrote in an Area of Darkness that “Indians defecate everywhere” - beside the railway tracks, on the beaches, on the hills, on the riverbanks and on the streets. “They never look for cover,” he said with absolute disgust.
India was smarter than Koestler and Naipaul — it promptly banned both the books.
When the South Asia correspondent of New York Times, Gardiner Harris, wrote on 29 May (Holding Your Breath in India) — that Delhi is an unliveable place because of pollution and that he left the city to safeguard his son’s health, the outrage was similar. There was no possibility of banning an article on the Internet, but angry Indians took to social media and slammed Harris for being an elitist expat. Some said while he was over-protective over his child, he had scant regard for the Indian children in Delhi who had no option but to live there, little realising that his voice was that of a frustrated father, who doesn’t have to put his family through the perils of living in a dirty city.
Harris wrote: “Foreigners have lived in Delhi for centuries, of course, but the air and the mounting research into its effects have become so frightening that some feel it is unethical for those who have a choice to willingly raise children here. Similar discussions are doubtless underway in Beijing and other Asian megacities, but it is in Delhi — among the most populous, polluted, unsanitary and bacterially unsafe cities on earth — where the new calculus seems most urgent.”
He hits where it hurts. The capital of a super power aspirant, a country which is projected to become the world’s third biggest economy in 2020, has been described as “among the most populous, polluted, unsanitary and bacterially unsafe cities on earth”. He also goes on to add that out of the 25 worst polluted cities in the world, 13 are in India.
It’s remarkable that even after 50 years since Koestler and Naipaul refused to hold back their revulsion to the all-pervading filth in India, it still remains a humiliating truth that visitors find out the moment they set their foot in the country.
In his recent overseas tour, Prime Minister Narendra Modi claimed that earlier Indians felt ashamed of being born in India, but now they feel proud. Do they? His point was political. He thought that the change of government in India makes its people proud. But in reality, Indians should still be ashamed because outsiders find their country too filthy to live in; the filth that has permeated every state of matter — solid, liquid, gas and perhaps even plasma. It doesn’t befit a modern nation that’s apparently raring to go.
What Koestler and Naipaul wrote in the sixties and what Harris wrote in 2015 are not anecdotal, but are borne out by facts. According to WHO, India accounts for 90 percent of open defecation in South Asia and 59 percent of the practice in the world. It also accounts for more than twice the number of open defecations of the 18 countries that come after it in the WHO list.
WHO also says that close to 100 million Indians don’t have access to improved sources of water, which is not surprising because our waterways are filled with filth. According to Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) 2011-12 annual report, about 60 percent of India’s water-sources (which are routinely monitored) have poor “bio-chemical oxygen demand”, an indicator of organic pollution, and about 68 percent have faecal coliform — bacteria from shit.
In other words, more than 60 percent of our water sources are polluted with organic waste and faecal matter. This happens because untreated sewage, faeces and other organic wastes are led into rivers and ponds that Indians draw their water from. Industrial waste and toxic substances that are dumped into them on an hourly basis make them lethal. All major Indian rivers are polluted by industrial effluents and untreated sewage. In its report, the Pollution Control Board even specifically mentions how under-capacity sewage treatment plants let out raw filth into the rivers at various places.
In terms of air quality, the principal concern of Harris in Delhi, 79 percent of metropolitan cities have very high levels of particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide, both of which are the main causes of air pollution. Among the four metros, the presence of particulate matter in Delhi is a well-known story and is obviously rising compared to others. But Delhi is not alone, many other cities, including small towns are asphyxiating in their own emissions.
Delhiites can be peeved because Harris picked on their city while the rest of urban India is no different. It’s only a matter of degree of criticality (air pollution levels are classified as low, medium, hight and critical). The fact of the matter is that urban India is rotting and is sinking in its own filth.
Can the Prime Minister’s boutique project of “Swatch Bharat” change this?
Absolutely not, because the socio-economic determinants of this environmental degradation are far deeper than what’s apparent. With more than 42 percent of its population living in 53 cities, India’s urbanization is so skewed that it’s hard to provide a matching civic infrastructure and therefore untreated sewage will continue to flow into rivers, lakes, and open places. If the agriculture and rural employment continue to fail, it will get worse.
Without stopping open defecation, the spread of coliform and other parasites cannot be stopped. Without cracking down on crony-capitalists, including big corporates, the dumping of effluents into rivers and toxic gases into air will not stop. Without providing reliable public transport, the ambient air can never get clean.
And more importantly, all these are to be handled at the local level by the state governments and local bodies. Given the pathetic standards of governance and political priorities in some states, it’s a daunting task.
In the end, India’s filth is a metaphor for its overall ills that include poverty, inequality, castes, corruption, poor development policies and greed. It’s not a question of aesthetics, but a question of fundamental social change.
Evolution (or more specifically
biological or organic evolution) is the change over time in one or more
inherited traits found in populations of individuals. Inherited traits are
distinguishing characteristics, for example anatomical, biochemical or
behavioural, that are passed on from one generation to the next. Evolution
occurs when there is variation of inherited traits within a population over
time. The major sources of such inherited variants are mutation, genetic
recombination and gene flow. Evolution has led to the diversification of all
living organisms from a common ancestor.
Evolution of the great apes:
Species close to the last common ancestor of gorillas,
chimpanzees and humans may be represented by Nakalipithecus fossils found in
Kenya and Ouranopithecus found in Greece. Molecular evidence suggests that
between 8 and 4 million years ago, first the gorillas, and then the chimpanzees
(genusPan) split off from the line leading to the humans; human DNA is
approximately 98.4% identical to that of chimpanzees when comparing single
nucleotide polymorphisms (see human evolutionary genetics).
The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes
that humans and apes derive from an apelike ancestor that lived on earth a few
million years ago. The theory states that man, through a combination of
environmental and genetic factors, emerged as a species to produce the variety
of ethnicities seen today, while modern apes evolved on a separate evolutionary
pathway.
...Also--and somewhat confusingly--it seems that later
archosaurs (like Desmatosuchus) coexisted with the earliest dinosaurs (like
Eoraptor and Herrerasaurus). In evolutionary terms, this poses no
contradiction: evolved animals often wind up living side-by-side with the
(relatively unevolved) descendants of their "progenitor" species. But
it does pose a problem to paleontologists trying to definitively classify
Triassic-period fossils.
The Afro
Hair From a Bio-Evolutionary Perspective
"Black People Are Less Intelligent than Everyone
Else"- Dr. James Watson
Black
people
The term black person is used in systems of racial
classification for humans of a dark skinnedphenotype, relative to other
racial groups.
Different societies apply different criteria regarding who
is classified as "black", and often social variables such as class,
socio-economic status also plays a role so that relatively dark skinned people
can be classified as white if they fulfill other social criteria of whiteness
and relatively light skinned people can be classified as black if they fulfill
the social criteria for blackness. As a biological phenotype being
"black" is often associated with the very dark skin colors of some
people who are classified as 'black'. But, particularly in the United States,
the racial classification also refers to people with all possible kinds of skin
pigmentation from the darkest through to the very lightest skin colors, including
albinos, if they are believed by others to have African ancestry and exhibit
cultural traits associated with being "African-American".
Therefore, the term 'black people' is not an indicator of skin color but of
racial classification.
Dark
skinned people; Our distant evolutionary cousins. (bro!)
Dark-skinned people evolved in isolation from other groups,
under different sets of selective pressures, physical variations that are
different in combination from any other group. To give you an idea of how
varied it is, when you look at the degree of genetic diversity in humans around
the world, what you find is a disproportionate concentration in Africa, found
in the various tribes and ethnic groupings there. Groups of people left Africa
and colonized the rest of the world, but of four main branches in the human
lineage (based on mitochondrial DNA), only one branch moved out of Africa to
populate the rest of the continents.
Dark skin
The evolution of dark skin is linked intrinsically to the
loss of body hair in humans. By 1.2 million years ago, all people having
descendants today had the same receptor protein of today's Africans; their skin
was dark, and the intense sun lowered the chance of survival of those with
lighter skin that resulted from mutational variation in the receptor protein.
This is significantly earlier than the speciation of Homo sapiens from Homo Erectus some 250,000 years ago.
Hair:
The texture of hair in people of Sub-Saharan African
ancestry is noticeably different from that of Eurasian populations, as noted by
Herodotus.
The specific characteristics of the natural afro-hair form
are unique among all mammals.The texture likely predates the evolution of dark
skin. It evolved when, as pre-human Australopithecines lost most of their fur
to enable perspiration, the need to protect the newly exposed pale skin
underneath this body hair was crucial, the trait ceased to be essential to
survival at the equator upon the evolution of hairless dark skin. Yet it has
continued to be expressed vestigially among most Melanesians, Andaman
Islanders, and sub-Saharan Africans.
Consequence
of this Evolutionary deficit:
Negros evolutionary deficit which simply is the fact that
they didn’t advanced much from the stage of homo erectus as homo s. Sapien or modern
human does, they stagnated at an quasi primate stage which is characterized by
more strength, bigger arms and relative bigger upper body and small brain and
limited mental abilities...As a result those characteristics will be at the
root of the failure of the educational system in America, since the standards
been lowered progressively to adapt to primates students, as a result this
state of mind will expand and shape American Education as we know it
today...=> based on primates intelligence standards.
It’s a
harsh cold world:
Negros adapting their evolutionary deficit to modern humans’
society.
Negroes, as a reaction to a mixed milieu, they've got to
improve their image and to lose the primates look characteristics, different
methods been used to achieve a more presentable look:
A variation of the Afro hair is resulting by
Cross-breeding with caucasians.
They were typically the children of white planters, or their
sons or overseers, who had relationships with or had raped and impregnated,
enslaved women. By the 18th century in Virginia, travelers already noted the
high rate of mixed-race people, and many shades of color found among slaves.
There were traveler reports of "white slaves", meaning those who
looked white and had only a small part of African ancestry.
Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States,
fathered a second family with his slave girl, Sally Hemings.
Let's EVOLVE!
The main issues of evolution of Negroes is their hair, the
hair represent the main visible evolutionary deficit of the Black race, along
with the skin, which they may compensate by the (tanning excuse)
Wigs, hair straitening and all kinds of skin bleaching and
Hair treatment is a flourishing industry because of Negros evolutionary
deficit.
The use of Wigs by Black females CHALLENGES Darwin Theory
of Evolution.
Wigs and skin bleaching products represent the “visible missed
link” between modern Humans and Homo-Erectus.
A simple Wig can make a Black female cross hundreds of thousands
of years of the Human evolutionary process.
"Wigs let black females beat the Evolution theory of
the origin of species; a Negra can cross hundreds of thousands of years of the
evolutionary process just by wearing a wig."
The Hair
issue in America: a cultural and Historical dimension
The Hair issue among females of color is a characteristic of
the American society. It is a cultural trait of the African American community;
as a step ahead from the Afro-hair of the civil rights movement and the post
segregation era into assimilation and a more presentable look, by all kinds of
alternative to the Afro hair.
The Afro-hair, representing an era of social
subordination.
African Americans today, consider themselves more melting
into the texture of the American society
by all kinds of wigs and alternative to the afro hair, thinking of it as
a step ahead into the "white wanna be" syndrome they are suffering
from, While in reality they look like clowns, or Negro females walking around
with an Indian woman's hair.
The Hair issue among females of colors in America, will
reach another dimension by the exportation of the image of Michelle Obama as
the first lady of color to the world.
As a natural reaction to save the reputation of the White
House and of America in general; fortunes will be spent on the first Negra’s
hair in an attempt to present the image of America as a multi-color nation in a
decent way to the world.
Repercussion of the Hair issue on the world's situation.
This is the symbolic picture of the infusion of the soul
into the Homo S. Sapien after it reached an certain degree of evolutionary
process, it is a marking step in the history of humanity, since obviously there
is no creation but intelligent design and "controlled" evolution, the
infusion of the soul or the light will open the Homo S. Sapien into new ,
perspective, marking a decisive line between 2 sides. The Homo Erectus,
stagnant in the evolutionary phase in Africa wont get that divine gift,
explaining the evolutionary gap at the roots of biggest humanity issues
nowadays, including, but not limited to the disparity if distribution of
wealth, the gap in mental and economic development. The transatlantic slave
trade will be a decisive point in defining humanity actual state, mixing seeds
in America reached dramatic levels, the darkness took over, along with native
Americans remains and Jews, whom, even though you can't place them in the same
level as the evolutionary level of Africans, were historically subordinate,
creating opportune condition to the corruption of their soul. The overall
result is the American empire as we know incarnation of the Zionist regime or
the doctrine of darkness in its path of revenge of Homo S. Sapiens infused by
Gods soul.
While, what's happening in Jamaica gets more attention due to the racial nature of Jamaican and the nature of tourists, mostly whites from Europe, Canada and mostly America, its like there is a colonization of Whites of the Island for some lustful purposes, it is happening in America at a lot larger scale, and it don't get that much attention because of the absence of masse movement of a race to "visit" another race, since America is united between Black and white, so, nobody will remark "Rent a Negro" going on in America, since generations at a massive scale, it is just part of American culture, and a bedrock of the Union.
Franco TaMere
When white women flock to Jamaica for a little fun in the sun, the RandR they're often looking for is not Rest and Relaxation but to Rent a Rasta according to director J. Michael Seyfert. His eye-opening expose' of the same name sheds light on a barely acknowledged form of sex tourism, namely, white women who visit the Caribbean Islands to get their groove back with the help of black locals. This documentary claims that, each year, as many as 80,000 females from a variety of relatively-wealthy Western nations descend on Jamaica alone.
Most of those inclined to indulge their Island Fever with wanton abandon are apparently middle-aged and/or overweight spinsters. Ignored by white men, and afraid to date blacks openly due to the social taboo, they look for satisfaction at remote resorts amidst the anonymity offered by a virtual paradise. These decadent dames safely lure their boy toys with money, electronic gadgets, designer clothes, baubles, or whatever material item it takes to get uncomplicated sexual favors in return along with the strict understanding that like in Las Vegas, What happens in Jamaica, stays in Jamaica. As one satisfied customer, a 45 year-old spinster from the Midwest explains her addiction to her hedonistic getaway, A girl who no one looks at twice gets hit on all the time here.
All these guys are paying her attention, telling her she's really beautiful, and they really want her. It is like a secret, a fantasy, and then you go home. While this glimpse of the lucky ladies' rationale for their no-strings liaisons is certainly informative, the picture is actually far more interesting when chronicling the history of Jamaica, winding its way from the slave days through the rise of the Rastafari to the present. Framed from this perspective, we suddenly see a persistent pattern of utter subjugation and economic inequality, with islanders providing stud service only being the latest form of exploitation.
The forced coexistence between the Homo Erectus and the Homo s. Sapien imposed by the transatlantic slave trade was never supposed to happen, in this large demographic scale, the evolutionary gap is so large and it caused unprecedented event in the history of Humanity, evil spirit was locked up in Africa and it being unleashed into the world through the American Empire, wonder why Americans are Dumbed Down, Dead Brain, Zombie, why America is one of the major powers in the world along with Soviet Russia and E.U, while Americans are the stupidest creatures on the planet, they are corpses been used by the Evil spirit created as a result of the union between the Homo Erectus and Homo s. Sapien or as it is commonly called between Black and White, people stood against that Union upon the end of the civil war, Liberia was established as American colony to ship former slaves back, Lincoln got assassinated, shit happened, there was MLK civil alright movement, then the African Americans as we know them today, American national treasure, and the Black Live matter crap.
Negroes, upon emancipation, will keep a low profile, and progressively they sneak their way into -forced failed integration- same way as Satan sneaked into the garden to tempt Eve, which is a bedtime story since There Is Evolution, in fact, that scenario of the Garden of Eden is a reality in American History and that’s exactly what happened during the 70's weed interracial and homo sex revolution, simply called the American revolution. The creationists say that Satan tempted Eve, and there was different interpretation of eating the forbidden fruit, since it is more mythology than reality, given the strength of the arguments of the evolution theory, and the continuous proofs presented by science and anthropology, Negros hosting evil spirit brought from the darkness of Africa will start tempting and manipulating Whites using weed and interracial and homo sex, reminder, Devils most powerful weapons are drugs and sex, along with lies, manipulation and playing the victim card to gain trust and sympathy then take control of the mind and soul, there was like another creation in the relative sense of the word, in term of the rise of America as a superpower in a record time (America is the only country who went from barbarism to decadence with no civilization in between), and the status of Americans as another "specie" in term of physical characteristics, and mental decay.
That's what happened in the civil rights movement, MLK failed or got mediocre results, drugs and sex revolution succeeded and after 70's America surfaced as a super power while racial tension vanished like by magic, of course it took a little while to get all the masses under control, but that was an abnormally fast process due to the history of America, that was like a powerful global mind control going on, must say drugs and interracial sex reached deep in the souls that’s why Negros are talking about getting into the soul of the women, usually the process of taking control of her soul happens during sex and she’s Satan property, of course she looks and act normal, she even have white husband and kids, and since she is hosting evil spirit that control her soul and mind, control is contagious she will influence, voir transmit the evil spirit to husband and kids explaining the ritual of the collective Homo Erectus worship in America, through sport and showbiz.
To resume, America rise up as an Evil super power by breaking the harmony of the rules of the human nature and forcibly mixing genes with the Homo Erectus to rise the flag and control the world. Hitler was aware of the unholy nature of the American Empire he didn't see it this way, he stated in his declaration of war on the States that -The largest presence of Negros present signs of cultural decay- He didn't realize that’s Devil in its passive/victim phase before it takes over and mutate to 300+ lbs we see today. But he does got the nature of Jews, which will be at the roots of the Evil Zionist global Imperialist movement destroying all the Planet and implementing Israel in the middle east as an Illegal cancer in the Muslim holy region to prevent any union in the area since Muslims were aware of the Danger of the Homo Erectus around Humans, castration of slaves was going on vs. cuckolding in America, of course large parts of Muslim people got corrupted as well they mixed up with slaves and got as low as Mexicans in America selling Halal food and kissing America's ass. Brief, Hitler failed to save the world from the prevail of evil Zionism...
"If by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah to ashes he condemned them to extinction, making them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;"
2 Peter 2:6
"But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house. And they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.” Lot went out to the men at the entrance, shut the door after him, and said, “I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly. Behold, I have two daughters who have not known any man. Let me bring them out to you, and do to them as you please. Only do nothing to these men, for they have come under the shelter of my roof.”
Genesis 19:4-8
“Sodomite” comes from the city of Sodom that was destroyed by God in Genesis 19 because of their gross immorality, the sin of homosexuality).
Sodomy used to be a crime in America. Now they lobby for special rights. Sodomites used to be considered pathologically ill and were discharged from the military. Sodomites choose sodomy because there are no moral rules to observe such as they would be expected to adhere to in a traditional marriage with accountability to in-laws. The increasing legalization of sodomy in America licenses the sinfulness of sexual perversions and all of the its companion sins making it clear to all with eyes to see and ears to hear, America is in rebellion against God Almighty as a nation.
Once political parties get into a competition to win millions of votes the sodomites represent, the nation begins to lose its sanity. Our national leaders are not building yachts so citizens who dream of sailing the high seas can live their dreams. They are not manufacturing race cars so citizens who dream racing can live their dreams. Our nation is suffering from a housing shortage and many are living in sub-standard conditions dreaming of what it might be like to live in a nice home, and our national leaders are requiring America to build extra bathrooms for perverts?
When the majority of the American public voted for Barack Obama as president, they knew what they were doing. They were not blind about his positions and principles. They knew that he was the most pro-abortion president in our history. And they knew that he was radically pro-homosexuality. He demonstrated this both in his speeches as well as his promotions and practice.
Once again, President Obama has proclaimed June “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month.” Years ago this sort of proclamation would have been unimaginable, but today it hardly raises an eyebrow.
Not only has President Obama promoted these wicked and perverse sexual orientations and relationships, but he has endorsed these as “prideful” during this sexually immoral “Pride” month! The President has also proclaimed the end of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the military that will allow sodomites to openly serve the country. This too would have been unimaginable years ago, but the President is rushing to allow this sort of perversion in the nation’s fighting force. Beyond this, the President has campaigned to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act that makes marriage the union of a man and woman, not two of the same sex. In fact, earlier in the year, he directed the Department of Justice to not defend the Act.
It is interesting that in the early years of this country, the colonies considered homosexuality to be “a crime against nature” and made it a capital offense, punishable by execution. Note this quotation:
In his concurring decision in the Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) case, Supreme Court Justice Burgher wrote:
"...the proscriptions against sodomy have very 'ancient roots.' Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeao-Christian moral and ethical standards. Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law....During the English Reformation when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statute criminalizing sodomy was passed. Blackstone described 'the infamous crime against nature' as an offense of 'deeper malignity' than rape, a heinous act 'the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature,' and 'a crime not fit to be named." ...To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching." (religioustolerance.org /hom_laws1.htm)
Not only are homosexuality and these related sexual sins not receiving the death penalty as they did in the earlier years of America (and before that in Europe), but they seem to have gained acceptance in this country, especially among the youth and those under forty. As this younger generation becomes older, it would seem that the country as a whole could be considered pro-sodomite (“sodomite” comes from the city of Sodom that was destroyed by God in Genesis 19 because of their gross immorality, the sin of homosexuality).
The cities with large homosexual populations, and which advertise themselves as “gay’ meccas, are the most perverse in the world. San Francisco is an example. Deviance begets deviance, pushing “tolerance” to preposterous extremes. Only the committed, and corrupted, social liberal sees this as acceptable. A couple of years ago when I and others went to observe Folsom and protest the public depravities, we were struck by how straight liberals came to accept these hideous “fairs” in the name of tolerance. One reporter, who told me she had been raised in a Christian home, acted as if we outsiders who were condemning the public lewdness were more suspect than the debauched behavior itself. (I doubt her mother would agree.) God does indeed give people over to a reprobate, depraved mind – and it is only through the inestimable grace of God that some men and women once lost in the twisted world of Gays Gone Wild (and its advocacy) leave it and return to sanity. — Peter LaBarbera
NYC is another extremely deviant city, beyond the traditional definition of homosexuality and how it thrived in Harlem and the Bronx, mainly interracial gay sex and the flourishing of bathhouses in NYC a new practice is been introduced and an new sexual slur is Down-low is an African American slang term that refers to a subculture of men who usually identify as heterosexual, but who have sex with men; some avoid sharing this information even if they have female sexual partner(s). The term is also used to refer to a related sexual identity. Down-low has been viewed as '"a type of impression management that some of the informants use to present themselves in a manner that is consistent with perceived norms about masculine attribute, attitudes and behaviour'
The term originated in the African American community, and was originally used to describe "any kind of slick, secretive behavior, including infidelity in heterosexual relationships." read more http://loshomos.blogspot.com/
According to a study published in the Journal of Bisexuality: "The Down Low is a lifestyle predominately practiced by young, urban African American men who have sex with other men and women, yet do not identify as gay or bisexual."
In this context, "being on the Down Low" is more than just men having sex with men in secret, or a variant of closeted homosexuality or bisexuality — it is a sexual identity that is, at least partly, defined by its "cult of masculinity" and its rejection of what is perceived as white culture (including white LGBT culture) and terms. A 2003 New York Times Magazine cover story on the Down Low phenomenon explains that the black community sees "homosexuality as a white man's perversion." It then goes on to describe the Down Low culture as follows:
"Rejecting a gay culture they perceive as white and effeminate, many black men have settled on a new identity, with its own vocabulary and customs and its own name: Down Low. There have always been men – black and white – who have had secret sexual lives with men. But the creation of an organized, underground subculture largely made up of black men who otherwise live straight lives is a phenomenon of the last decade... Most date or marry women and engage sexually with men they meet only in anonymous settings like bathhouses and parks or through the Internet. Many of these men are young and from the inner city, where they live in a hypermasculine thug culture. Other DL men form romantic relationships with men and may even be peripheral participants in mainstream gay culture, all unknown to their colleagues and families. Most DL men identify themselves not as gay or bisexual but first and foremost as black. To them, as to many blacks, that equates to being inherently masculine."
But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem- solving have never been the black man’s strengths, have they? Did they invent a long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever build a city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there’s no Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move the slabs of rock – clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more than 20 Negros normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope. Did they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a written language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they curious enough about what layout across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.
