From colored people to people of color: Shitskin stereotype
Colored people is a denomination of people of African descent (black), and native Americans improved by white genes aka Mestizos (Brown), both those groups were included in the racial slur; Shitskin.
The term colored people will extend beyond the 2 cited groups, to cover all none white people, making a clear distinction between 2 racial sides in the American society, white and colored.
During the 60's and 70's a segregation-era was characterizing the American society, meaning, there are specified areas designed for whites, and other areas for colored, signs were placed to distinguish between the 2 groups, and the obedience of the segregation was enforced by the authority of the law.
The society was in peace and harmony, until a certain Negra called Rosa Park, decided that she was light enough to pass for white, and sat at the front of the bus, most likely she was motivated by Jews pushing for civil rights movement crap, she was removed, because a certain law and order must be respected, causing all hell to break loose, leading to civil rights movement which can simply be translated into, rebellion against the law.
The term Shitskin is a derogatory slur, used for any person of black or brown skin in any shade, from the darkest as Jay-Z to the lighter as Beyoncé, it is originated long time ago back at plantations as a substitute for Nigger or Negro, as a derogatory way to call slaves, due to their skin color, which happened to be same as shit shades (organic waste) takes.
Post the civil rights movement, the segregation as it was known, being abolished, and no signs nor geographic limitation is separating colored people from whites, at least in the formal aspect, the denomination colored people will be replaced by 'People of color'.
'People of color', is new replacement for 'Colored people', it is more appropriate to the shift the American demographic composition has known post the civil rights movement, white got diluted by interracial sex, the country known a vague of mass immigration from central and south America, and many part if Asia, that was mostly aimed at giving civil rights movement a demographic weight, by all the immigrants that will necessarily join the black and brown population constituting the colored people which will be called people of color, to give it a more global specification, than the old definition limited to black and brown people, based on skin color, the appellation was originally made to make a stratification between whites and black/brown people, the country is white built and ruled, so it has a meaning beyond skin color, it is historically related to make distinction between the original people who were at the roots of the foundation of the country, who happened to be white, and the others, who will be simply called colored or people of color, doesn't matter their skin shade as long as they don't fit in the stratification of white Europeans, in fact its more of a definition of the difference between 2 social classes, the white Europeans who will be called white Americans, and whatever added up human kinds, from slaves descendants (Blacks), to native descendants improved by white genes (Mestizos), passing by all kinds of immigrants which will simply called colored people and recently, people of color, it is to be mentioned that it's not about skin colors as it was during slavery and early American racial interaction, it is to make distinction between whites and other racial groups, of course European immigrants won't be included in colored, in fact it's more related to ancestry than to appearance, it's a distinction between whites: modern humans and colored: other human kinds descendants of less evolved hominids, such the Homo Erectus, represented by the black race, and the Neanderthal improved by modern genes represented by Asian, Jews and native Americans.
This is the main criteria in making distinction between white and colored, it's not about the skin color, but about the ancestry, cross-breeding happened in an extensive way through generations, and sometimes it's hard to clearly define the racial group of a given person, since mixture of features may make the overall appearance shift to look like a given racial group, while the soul, is of the invisible features contained in genes, for example, a mixed white looking person may be considered colored if it has the soul of a colored person through cross breed and the white look.
Now, the demographic composition is a little ambiguous than it was post civil right movement, there was almost a clear distinction between colored and white, those days, a white looking person may be colored and a colored looking person may think that it's white, and may behave as a white person, under some circumstance, while its colored nature will resurface at first constraining conditions.
Segregation abolished, still in people's mind
While there is no limitation territorial in defining whites and colored areas, due to social and economic constraints, people tend to knowledge white areas from colored ones, without being forced to restrict themselves to their own areas, some mental obligations and acquaintance, deep in their subconscious, constraint them to exist in and around their respective areas, it's same way as animals feel they belong in the jungle, still you may find them wondering in humans areas, at the opposite, humans (Whites) won't adventure in colored area (jungle), unless it's a necessity, and they are armed or have the necessary protection (cops posts bare hand confront animals).
This is easily noticeable for ghetto areas, and areas of predominantly black and brown population due to its economic decline and living conditions, like Harlem, the Bronx, Philly, Detroit, some areas are "colored people areas" without any sign to be put to design it as so, some areas are white areas, simply because it's more prosperous and inaccessible to Blacks and Hispanics, unless it's for working opportunities, robberies or prostitution.
Policies of integration of colored people will create certain exceptions, let's take the coffee chain Starbucks for instance, the chain at its debut, was exclusively located in white areas, at the opposite of Dunkin donuts which's known as colored people coffee chain, then it expanded in a very narrowed scale to colored area, it still concentrated mainly in white areas, and despite the fact of the existence of some Starbucks in some marginal areas, it still so limited, the Bronx, for example, there is no Starbuck almost at all, except next to Yankees stadium, it is mostly due to its strategic location and doing business during the games, there is very few at Queens and Harlem as well, the same goes nationwide.
This is not to be generalized, but due to the nature of Starbuck, it may be considered as a sign of cultural or social segregation, I won't say economic segregation, because colored, consume in Starbucks just to cross that social stigma of Starbuck. Many examples of social, cultural and even economic segregation may be found in the American society but it's not the subject of this post.
While there is no segregation through signs and the authority of the law, economic and social constraints will create a certain type of stratification that is deep implemented in people's mind, so they tend to act like if there was a sign, in the relative sense of the expression and at a certain limit.
The Renaissance of shitskin stereotype: Beyond skin color, a designation for a colored ancestry.
I will push the traditional shitskin slur a little further, from an anthropological perspective, if we take modern humans, whites as the most advanced evolutionary stage humanity has known, all other human kinds that are descendants of less evolved hominids i.e. Blacks, native Americans, Asians, and Jews, are some kind of less advanced humans that have pushed into our existence through slavery, the discovery of the new world, the holocaust reparation and the necessity of cheap labor, those kinds, in term of humanity are less productive, since modern humans were at the root of the revolution industrial, and all the progress and prosperity humanity has known, while that must not be translated literally, from a biological/productive perspective they are some kind of organic waste compared to modern humans, because of their absence of contributions in humanity progress and their passive existence to consume what humanity produced and struggled to achieve during centuries. That goes since the "Out of Africa" event, after which Homo Erectus confronting extreme conditions will evolve into the more advanced form of human life, while the black race will stagnate at the Homo Erectus stage forming the African race, the Neanderthals won't evolve into modern humans neither, they got improved by modern humans genes, without being a 100% Homo S. Sapiens, forming Asian, Native Americans and Jews races.
Here, from an anthropological perspective, we can make clear distinction between, modern humans (Whites) and other less evolved kinds (Asians, Blacks, Native Americans and Jews), if we apply this stratification from a biological perspective, we can make distinction between, organically productive or useful matters and ...organic waste, which is useless living on modern humans progress and innovation.
The bedrock of human civilization was built by whites, from Greeks to the revolution industrial, Africans were backwarded since forever, native American were running around naked around 1500's until Christopher Columbus men gave them blankets, Asians, all they do is copy western civilization, and Jews are living like a parasite on humanity.
This will lead us forcibly to the conclusion that Whites or modern humans are some kind of organic anabolism, which means it constructs and builds while colored are just organic waste, in the relative sense of the word, meaning it's a passive form of life that consume thrive like a parasite... and destroy.
Now, we've seen how some racial groups are considered like some kind of organic waste from an anthropological, biologic and humanitarian perspective, let's put it in the frame of the distinction between social classes in America, more specifically between whites and people of color.
Easy, as presented in chapter one, people of color definition extended far beyond the distinction that was made before the civil rights movement, between Whites and Black or Brown people, it will be a distinction between whites and immigrants from all backgrounds except the white European nations which are the roots and ancestry of the White class, they got dumbed down, got perverted, they are some kind of degeneration of Europeans, still they are considered as European descendants from an anthropological point of view, of course, (Russians while they are white European from an anthropological perspective, they are considered some kind of supreme human beings), so as it's explained before, it's a distinction between modern humans and other kinds of less evolved hominids, as its explained above, there some kind of "Renaissance of shitskin stereotype", what was designed as ann appellation or slur used 'derogatory' for people of black or brown color and their descendants, now it being expanded, based on this post, and there is enough significant reasoning to prove the relative correlation between ancestry, and the status of some people as a passive for of life, as organic waste from a biological point of view, which makes shitskin slur expanded beyond skin color, not necessarily 'derogatory', since it is based on decent findings, about anthropology, history of humanity and the contribution of each humankind to the welfare of humanity, and now is a designation for a colored roots, which forcibly doesn't mean a skin color, but a certain ancestry.
Obama, for instance, is known to be a colored person, his father is African, mother is white American, as cited before the ancestry is 'rounded' to the colored roots, which makes him, a shitskin person; here we keep that slur as it originally was, despite it's not about skin color or shade, that's for compatibility purposes.😏.
No comments:
Post a Comment