The Take Over: Evil Prevails in America

“Obama’s America Is Planet Of Apes”

Glenn Beck compared Obama’s America to “the damn Planet of the Apes,” Thursday during a rant against the president’s praise for the AFL-CIO.

Beck made the comparison while trying to blame union support of strong pensions for the nation’s high unemployment rate. He doesn't like that former SEIU president Andy Stern sits on the president’s panel on deficit reduction.

The racial politics behind 'Planet of the Apes:

From the very beginning of movies, with D.W. Griffith's racist propaganda film The Birth of a Nation there have been racist themes and images in mainstream movies. For much of the 20th century, black audiences endured blackface, coons and with the exception of a few dignified Sidney Poitier roles in the 50s and 60s -- barely any representation at all. When the blaxploitation genre broke through in the 1970s it did give more African-American talent a chance to shine but these films largely glorified violence and crime, as well as brutality towards women.

The original Planet of the Apes, starring screen legend Charlton Heston, released in 1968, served as sort of a cinematic version of John Howard Griffin's 1961 book Black Like Me, where Griffin experienced life as a black man by darkening his skin and reported back on his findings. It's a "what if the shoe was on the other foot?" type scenario where white men experience the type of discrimination usually reserved for black people.

Apes imagined a fictional world 2,000 years in the future where monkeys, gorillas, and other primates take on human features including the sort of racism that the Civil Rights Movement was addressing at the time, only directed at human beings. It's about how power corrupts and can be used unjustly but one isn't always aware of the injustice until they experience it for themselves.

The Rise of the Planet of the Apes, a “re-imagining” of the classic Planet of the Apes movies, prove that the racial politics and stereotypes that have long fueled the franchise and are still very present in Hollywood.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 11 and last.

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                      From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    By Robert Morgan 

The 'Ile à Vache' Project

With the collapse of the Chiriqui plan, Lincoln next gave serious consideration to a small Caribbean island off the coast of the black republic of Haiti, Ile à Vache, as a possible resettlement site for freed blacks.

In December 1862, the President signed a contract with Bernard Kock, a businessman who said that he had obtained a long-term lease on the island. Kock agreed to settle 5,000 blacks on the island, and to provide them with housing, food, medicine, churches, schools, and employment, at a cost to the government of $50 each. About 450 blacks were accordingly transported to the island at federal government expense, but the project was not a success. As a result of poor organization, corruption, and Haitian government opposition, about a hundred of the deportees soon died of disease, thirst and starvation. In February-March 1864, a government-chartered ship brought the survivors back to the United States. After that, Congress canceled all funds it had set aside for black resettlement.

End of Resettlement Efforts

In early 1863, Lincoln discussed with his Register of the Treasury a plan to "remove the whole colored race of the slave states into Texas." Apparently nothing came of the discussion.

Hard-pressed by the demands of the war situation, and lacking a suitable resettlement site or even strong support within his own inner circle, Lincoln apparently gave up on specific resettlement efforts. On July 1, 1864, presidential secretary John Hay wrote in his diary: "I am happy that the President has sloughed off that idea of colonization."

Whatever its merits, the notion that America's racial question could be solved by massive resettlement of the black population probably never had much realistic prospect of success, given the realities of American life. Writing in The Journal of Negro History, historian Paul Scheips summed up:

... Large-scale colonization of Negroes could only have succeeded, if it could have succeeded at all, if the Nation had been willing to make the gigantic propaganda, diplomatic, administrative, transportation and financial effort that would have been required. As it was, according to [historian Carl] Sandburg, "in a way, nobody cared." But even had hundreds of thousands of Negroes been colonized, the Nation's race problem would not have been solved.

Abolishing Slavery

A Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which would prohibit slavery throughout the United States, was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864. Because the House failed immediately to approve it with the necessary two-thirds majority vote, Lincoln, in his Annual Message of December 6, asked the House to reconsider it. On January 31, 1865, and with three votes to spare, the House approved it. By this time, slavery had already been abolished in Arkansas, Louisiana, Maryland and Missouri, and a similar move seemed imminent in Tennessee and Kentucky.

On February 3, 1865, Lincoln and Secretary of State Seward met with a Confederate peace delegation that included Confederate Vice President Stephens. Lincoln told the delegation that he still favored compensation to owners of emancipated slaves. It had never been his intention, the President said, to interfere with slavery in the states; he had been driven to it by necessity. He believed that the people of the North and South were equally responsible for slavery. If hostilities ceased and the states voluntarily abolished slavery, he believed, the government would indemnify the owners to the extent, possibly, of $400 million. Although the conference was not fruitful, two days later Lincoln presented to his cabinet a proposal to appropriate $400 million for reimbursement to slave owners, providing hostilities stopped by April 1. (The cabinet unanimously rejected the proposal, which Lincoln then regretfully abandoned.)

On April 9, General Lee surrendered his army to General Grant at Appomatox Courthouse, and by the end of May, all fighting had ceased. The Civil War was over.

Lincoln's Fear of 'Race War'

A short time before his death on April 15, 1865, Lincoln met with General Benjamin F. Butler, who reported that the President spoke to him of "exporting" the blacks.

"But what shall we do with the negroes after they are free?," Lincoln said. "I can hardly believe that the South and North can live in peace, unless we can get rid of the negroes ... I believe that it would be better to export them all to some fertile country with a good climate, which they could have to themselves." Along with a request to Butler to look into the question of how best to use "our very large navy" to send "the blacks away," the President laid bare his fears for the future:

If these black soldiers of ours go back to the South, I am afraid that they will be but little better off with their masters than they were before, and yet they will be free men. I fear a race war, and it will be at least a guerilla war because we have taught these men how to fight ... There are plenty of men in the North who will furnish the negroes with arms if there is any oppression of them by their late masters.

To his dying day, it appears, Lincoln did not believe that harmony between white and black was feasible, and viewed resettlement of the blacks as the preferable alternative to race conflict. " ... Although Lincoln believed in the destruction of slavery," concludes black historian Charles Wesley (in an article in The Journal of Negro History), "he desired the complete separation of the whites and blacks. Throughout his political career, Lincoln persisted in believing in the colonization of the Negro."

Lincoln's perception of  the racial reality of America

Frederick Douglass, a gifted African American writer and activist who knew Lincoln, characterized him in a speech delivered in 1876:

In his interest, in his association, in his habits of thought, and in his prejudices, he was a white man. He was preeminently the white man's President, entirely devoted to the welfare of the white man. He was ready and willing at any time during the first years of his administration to deny, postpone, and sacrifice the rights of humanity in the colored people, to promote the welfare of the white people of this country.

Allan Nevins, one of this century's most prolific and acclaimed historians of US history, summed up Lincoln's view of the complex issue of race, and his vision of America's future:

His conception ran beyond the mere liberation of four million colored folks; it implied a far-reaching alteration of American society, industry, and government. A gradual planned emancipation, a concomitant transportation of hundreds of thousands and perhaps even millions of people overseas, a careful governmental nursing of the new colonies, and a payment of unprecedented sums to the section thus deprived of its old labor supply -- this scheme carried unprecedented implications.

To put this into effect would immensely increase the power of the national government and widen its abilities. If even partially practicable, it would mean a long step toward rendering the American people homogeneous in color and race, a rapid stimulation of immigration to replace the workers exported, a greater world position for the republic, and a pervasive change in popular outlook and ideas. The attempt would do more to convert the unorganized country into an organized nation than anything yet planned. Impossible, and undesirable even if possible? -- probably; but Lincoln continued to hold to his vision.

For most Americans today, Lincoln's plan to "solve" America's vexing racial problem by resettling the blacks in a foreign country probably seems bizarre and utterly impractical, if not outrageous and cruel. At the same time, though, and particularly when considered in the context of the terrible Civil War that cost so many lives, it is worth pondering just why and how such a far-fetched plan was ever able to win the support of a leader of the stature and wisdom of Abraham Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 9

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                                            From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     By Robert Morgan

The Emancipation Proclamation

During the winter and spring 1861-1862, public support grew rapidly for the view that slavery must be abolished everywhere. Lincoln did not ignore the ever louder calls for decisive action.

On June 19, he signed a law abolishing slavery in all the federal territories. At the same time, he was quietly preparing an even more dramatic measure.

At a cabinet meeting on July 22, Lincoln read out the draft text of a document he had prepared -- a proclamation that would give the Confederate states a hundred days to stop their "rebellion" upon threat of declaring all slaves in those states to be free.

The President told his cabinet that he did not want advice on the merits of the proclamation itself -- he had made up his mind about that, he said -- but he would welcome suggestions about how best to implement the edict. For two days cabinet members debated the draft. Only two -- Secretary of State William Seward and Treasury Secretary Salmon Chase, abolitionists who had challenged Lincoln for the 1860 Republican presidential nomination -- agreed even in part with the proclamation's contents. Seward persuaded the President not to issue it until after a Union military victory (of which so far there had been few), or otherwise, it would appear "the last measure of an exhausted government, a cry for help."

Emancipation/Colonization: First war for freedom in American history.

Union General McClellan's success on September 17 in holding off the forces of General Lee at Antietam provided a federal victory of sorts, and the waited-for opportunity. Five days later, Lincoln issued his Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, which included a favorable reference to colonization:

I, Abraham Lincoln ... do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States, and each of the states, and the people thereof ...

That it is my purpose, upon the next meeting of Congress to again recommend the adoption of a practical measure tendering pecuniary aid to the free acceptance or rejection of all slave-states, so called, the people whereof may not be then be in rebellion against the United States, and which states, may then have voluntarily adopted, or thereafter may voluntarily adopt, immediate, or gradual abolishment of slavery within their respective limits; and that the effort to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere, with the previously obtained consent of the Governments existing there, will be continued.

Lincoln then went on to state that on January 1, 1863,

all persons held as slaves within any state, or designated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever, free ...

The edict then cited the law passed by Congress on March 13, 1862, which prohibited military personnel from returning escaped slaves, and the second Confiscation Act of July 1862.

Proclamation Limitations

On New Year's Day, 1863, Lincoln issued the final Emancipation Proclamation. Contrary to what its title suggests, however, the presidential edict did not immediately free a single slave. It "freed" only slaves who were under Confederate control, and explicitly exempted slaves in Union-controlled territories, including federal-occupied areas of the Confederacy, West Virginia, and the four slave-holding states that remained in the Union.

The Proclamation, Secretary Seward wryly commented, emancipated slaves where it could not reach them, and left them in bondage where it could have set them free. 

Moreover, because it was issued as a war measure, the Proclamation's long-term validity was uncertain. Apparently, any future President could simply revoke it. "The popular picture of Lincoln using a stroke of the pen to lift the shackles from the limbs of four million slaves is ludicrously false," historian Allan Nevins has noted.

'Military Necessity'

Lincoln himself specifically cited "military necessity" as his reason for issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. After more than a year of combat, and in spite of its great advantages in industrial might and numbers, federal forces had still not succeeded in breaking the South. 

At this critical juncture of the war, the President apparently now hoped, a formal edict abolishing slavery in the Confederate states would strike a blow at the Confederacy's ability to wage war by encouraging dissension, escapes, and possibly revolt among its large slave labor force.

As the war progressed, black labor had become ever more critical in the hard-pressed Confederacy. Blacks planted, cultivated and harvested the food that they then transported to the Confederate armies. Blacks raised and butchered the beef, pigs and chicken used to feed the Confederate troops. They wove the cloth and knitted the socks to clothe the grey-uniformed soldiers. As Union armies invaded the South, tearing up railroads and demolishing bridges, free blacks and slaves repaired them. They toiled in the South's factories, shipping yards, and mines. In 1862, the famous Tredegar ironworks advertised for 1,000 slaves. In 1864, there were 4,301 blacks and 2,518 whites in the iron mines of the Confederate states east of the Mississippi.

Blacks also served with the Confederate military forces as mechanics, teamsters, and common laborers. They cared for the sick and scrubbed the wounded in Confederate hospitals. Nearly all of the South's military fortifications were constructed by black laborers. Most of the cooks in the Confederate army were slaves. Of the 400 workers at the Naval Arsenal in Selma, Alabama, in 1865, 310 were blacks. Blacks served with crews of Confederate blockade-runners and stoked the firerooms of the South's warships.

Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, the legendary cavalry commander, said in a postwar interview: "When I entered the army I took 47 Negroes into the army with me, and 45 of them were surrendered with me ... These boys stayed with me, drove my teams, and better Confederates did not live."

Slavery: The bedrock of the Union.

On several occasions, Lincoln explained his reasons for issuing the Proclamation. On September 13, 1862, the day after the preliminary proclamation was issued, Lincoln met with a delegation of pro-abolitionist Christian ministers, and told them bluntly: "Understand, I raise no objections against it [slavery] on legal or constitutional grounds ... I view the matter [emancipation] as a practical war measure, to be decided upon according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion."

To Salmon Chase, his Treasury Secretary, the President justified the Proclamations' limits: "The original [preliminary] proclamation has no constitutional or legal justification, except as a military measure," he explained. "The exceptions were made because the military necessity did not apply to the exempted localities. Nor does that pressure apply to them now any more than it did then."

Horace Greeley, editor of the influential New York Tribune, called upon the President to immediately and totally abolish slavery in an emphatic and prominently displayed editorial published August 20, 1862. Lincoln responded in a widely-quoted letter:

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union ...

Concern about growing sentiment in the North to end slavery, along with sharp criticism from prominent abolitionists, was apparently another motivating factor for the President. (Abolitionists even feared that the Confederate states might give up their struggle for independence before the January first deadline, and thus preserve the institution of slavery.)

Lincoln assured Edward Stanly, a pro-slavery Southerner he had appointed as military governor of the occupied North Carolina coast, that "the proclamation had become a civil necessity to prevent the radicals from openly embarrassing the government in the conduct of the war."

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 1:

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25. 

                                                                                                                                      By Robert Morgan

Many Americans think of Abraham Lincoln, above all, as the president who freed the slaves. Immortalized as the "Great Emancipator," he is widely regarded as a champion of black freedom who supported social equality of the races, and who fought the American Civil War (1861-1865) to free the slaves.

While it is true that Lincoln regarded slavery as an evil and harmful institution, it is also true, as this paper will show, that he shared the conviction of most Americans of his time, and of many prominent statesmen before and after him, that blacks could not be assimilated into white society. He rejected the notion of social equality of the races, and held to the view that blacks should be resettled abroad. As President, he supported projects to remove blacks from the United States.

Early Experiences

In 1837, at the age of 28, the self-educated Lincoln was admitted to practice law in Illinois. In at least one case, which received considerable attention at the time, he represented a slave-owner. Robert Matson, Lincoln's client, each year brought a crew of slaves from his plantation in Kentucky to a farm he owned in Illinois for seasonal work. State law permitted this, provided that the slaves did not remain in Illinois continuously for a year. In 1847, Matson brought to the farm his favorite mulatto slave, Jane Bryant (wife of his free, black overseer there), and her four children. A dispute developed between Jane Bryant and Matson's white housekeeper, who threatened to have Jane and her children returned to slavery in the South. With the help of local abolitionists, the Bryants fled. They were apprehended, and, in an affidavit sworn out before a justice of the peace, Matson claimed them as his property. Lacking the required certificates of freedom, Bryant and the children were confined to local county jail as the case was argued in court. Lincoln lost the case, and Bryant and her children were declared free. 

First cases of resettlement

They were later resettled in Liberia. In 1842 Lincoln married Mary Todd, who came from one of Kentucky's most prominent slave-holding families. While serving as an elected representative in the Illinois legislature, he persuaded his fellow Whigs to support Zachary Taylor, a slave owner, in his successful 1848 bid for the Presidency. Lincoln was also a strong supporter of the Illinois law that forbid marriage between whites and blacks.

Ambitions before the assassination

"If all earthly power were given me," said Lincoln in a speech delivered in Peoria, Illinois, on October 16, 1854, "I should not know what to do, as to the existing institution [of slavery]. My first impulse would be to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia, to their own native land." After acknowledging that this plan's "sudden execution is impossible," he asked whether freed blacks should be made "politically and socially our equals?" "My own feelings will not admit of this," he said, "and [even] if mine would, we well know that those of the great mass of white people will not ... We can not, then, make them equals."

One of Lincoln's most representative public statements on the question of racial relations was given in a speech at Springfield, Illinois, on June 26, 1857.6 In this address, he explained why he opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which would have admitted Kansas into the Union as a slave state:

Incompatibility of Negros 

There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races ... A separation of the races is the only perfect preventive of amalgamation, but as an immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together. If white and black people never get together in Kansas, they will never mix blood in Kansas ...

Necessity of Reservation

Racial separation, Lincoln went on to say, "must be effected by colonization" of the country's blacks to a foreign land. "The enterprise is a difficult one," he acknowledged,

but "where there is a will there is a way," and what colonization needs most is a hearty will. Will springs from the two elements of moral sense and self-interest. Let us be brought to believe it is morally right, and, at the same time, favorable to, or, at least, not against, our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be.

To affirm the humanity of blacks, Lincoln continued, was more likely to strengthen public sentiment on behalf of colonization than the Democrats' efforts to "crush all sympathy for him, and cultivate and excite hatred and disgust against him ..." Resettlement ("colonization") would not succeed, Lincoln seemed to argue, unless accompanied by humanitarian concern for blacks, and some respect for their rights and abilities. 

Evolutionary background of slavery

By apparently denying the black person's humanity, supporters of slavery were laying the groundwork for "the indefinite outspreading of his bondage." The Republican program of restricting slavery to where it presently existed, he said, had the long-range benefit of denying to slave holders an opportunity to sell their surplus bondsmen at high prices in new slave territories, and thus encouraged them to support a process of gradual emancipation involving resettlement of the excess outside of the country.

Why Trump was Elected - A Cultural Card

Previously by Franco TaMere aka Lee Puniisher:

My days in America are counted, soon flying overseas away from this God damn perversion and anarchy land, away from stupid Indians wearing clothes trying to scalp you, keeping talking about hair because they used to scalp people, of monkeys blaming me for their fake freedom, of Chinese blaming me for their inferiority complex to Koreans and that they wear American kids clothes, and have a baby penis that's why they buy big cars, finally from pigs, who think I give shit about electing Trump, expect my support for doing what’s right in the internal affairs, after all, colored disrespected me because they have a Black in White proportions issue. Of course, America is gone oral since Osama bin Laden was killed even a U.N resolution won't make me pull off Americas mouth, aren't you pigs offered me a choice between many Chinese to marry one, because I was planning to marry a Russia woman, now you can tell Putin to convince me to pull off China's mouth, or maybe the little Zionist beasts in NYC of Chinese descent.

Trump campaign: an abnormal political process motivated by Evil Roots

I still don't know how I was posting pro-Trump posts, I felt for the devil trick, of convincing the world that he doesn't exist, switching sides between states and colors, between Democrats and Republicans, Black and White. He's like representing an entity that prevails in America and makes sure the Union is standing, from a weakness situation to an ever-rising Russia, it will try to gain strong nations trust, while continuing to bully the weak ones. https://www.rt.com/op-edge/384881-trump-dumps-campaign-pledges/

Trump Campaign: a reaction to Franco TaMere existence as Lee Puniisher entity

Punishment in progress, #MakeAmericaGreatAgain: enough of Franco TaMere and lee Puniisher mocking our culture, mating habits, employment, and education. Trump represents the incarnation of the Beast, an entity that surfaced in the American politics to save the union, in fact electing Trump is a matter of homeland security before its Democrats or Republicans. It (Trump) knows what's the real deal is and why a fake movement must be put up front to save America, not American jobs, or from U.S founded and funded ISIS, in fact its disturbingly shocking how America fakes it’s fighting something that it created to overthrow Al Assad, even Trump sounds stupid and totally ignorant in claiming fighting ISIS in his agenda, I guess an excuse for the Beast to unite with its imminent predator (Russia).

Negros – The Crappy Race Of Failures

From anonymous source on the web: all credit to the original author

Face the facts, Negros, your race is a failed race because you’re a feckless, unruly, uncivilized horde of feral proto-humans. You never figured out how to live in a society bigger than one or two squabbling families. Starting thousands of years ago, everyone else on this planet without exception did – they invented religion, the idea of law, and the ideas of property and respect for the value of human life. This enabled tribes to coalesce into bigger groups and become organized. The rest is history, or rather civilization.

But your lot never did this, did they? Abstract thought and problem- solving have never been the black man’s strengths, have they? Did they invent a long-lived and intellectually coherent religion? Nope. Did they ever build a city? Nope. Did they even invent bricks? Nope (the reason there’s no Stonehenge in Africa is because it took more than 20 people to move the slabs of rock – clearly a non-starter in Africa, where assembling more than 20 Negros normally results in a war). Did they till the land? Nope. Did they domesticate an animal for their use? Nope. Did they invent a written language? Nope. Did they invent the wheel? Mainly, nope. Were they curious enough about what layout across the sea to sail upon it? Nope.

Shit Warriors part 1

From colored people to people of color: Shitskin stereotype

Colored people is a denomination of people of African descent (black), and native Americans improved by white genes aka Mestizos (Brown), both those groups were included in the racial slur; Shitskin.

The term colored people will extend beyond the 2 cited groups, to cover all none white people, making a clear distinction between 2 racial sides in the American society, white and colored.

During the 60's and 70's a segregation-era was characterizing the American society, meaning, there are specified areas designed for whites, and other areas for colored, signs were placed to distinguish between the 2 groups, and the obedience of the segregation was enforced by the authority of the law.

The society was in peace and harmony, until a certain Negra called Rosa Park, decided that she was light enough to pass for white, and sat at the front of the bus, most likely she was motivated by Jews pushing for civil rights movement crap, she was removed, because a certain law and order must be respected, causing all hell to break loose, leading to civil rights movement which can simply be translated into, rebellion against the law.

The term Shitskin is a derogatory slur, used for any person of black or brown skin in any shade, from the darkest as Jay-Z to the lighter as Beyoncé, it is originated long time ago back at plantations as a substitute for Nigger or Negro, as a derogatory way to call slaves, due to their skin color, which happened to be same as shit shades (organic waste) takes.

Education in USA...the Great Failure.

U.S. Falls In World Education Rankings, Rated 'Average'

Ed. Clarification: HuffPost Education originally reported that the United States was ranked 14th by the OECD.

 That figure is the nation's ranking in reading skills, not the overall ranking of the country.

The United States has fallen to "average" in international education rankings released by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, according to the AFP .

America has received scores around 500 on a scale that goes up to 1,000: 487 in math, 500 in reading and 502 in science.

The AFP reports,

The three-yearly OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) report, which compares the knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds in 70 countries around the world, ranked the United States 14th out of 34 OECD countries for reading skills, 17th for science and a below-average 25th for mathematics.

Of course, the report above doesn't reflect the American Stupidity, it's the best presentation Americans can give of their primate-based standards educational system overseas, it doesn't expose the ignorance and the stupidity submerging America, within the states...In America schools are based on the minimum of intelligence standards due to the demographic composition of the American society.

But at least Americans are good in other fields...

Lee Puniisher...And American Politics.

Make America Great again: A heavy Motto

If you see a presidential candidate put such important issues on the table"as it is", meaning what it represents for the future of the country, not how to play that card to get votes, it is well known that the position on the immigration issue is key card into granting an comfortable weight in votes, presenting the real consequences of bad immigration policies is a brave act and a sign of honest candidate not a votes chaser.

The thing with Trump campaign is that, either ways, he gets elected or not, he will mark the presidential elections by his revolutionary statements, same as Obama marked it as first colored president.

America will never be great again with the actual demographic base tendency, those are better days, compared to the future projecting itself through the Zionist agenda of racial dilution.

The 14th Amendment: A rotten law, loophole in the constitution

“What happens is, they’re in Mexico, they’re going to have a baby, they move over here for a couple of days, they have the baby,” Trump told O’Reilly. "When people are illegally in the country, they have to go.”

O’Reilly said Trump’s plan would mean “federal police kicking in the doors in barrios around the country dragging families out and putting them on a bus.”

“I don’t think they have American citizenship,“ the real estate mogul and former Celebrity Apprentice host replied. “We have to start a process where we take back our country. Our country is going to hell. We have to start a process, Bill, where we take back our country.”

O’Reilly asked Trump if he would seek to amend the amendment.

“It would take too long,” Trump said. “I’d much rather find out whether or not anchor babies are actually citizens because a lot of people don’t think they are.”

Full article: https://www.yahoo.com/politics/donald-trump-says-14th-amendment-is-127077752761.html

The following video presents The irony of the status of the anchor babies, the law loophole in the American jurisdictional system, and the incompatibility of the 14th Amendment with today's circumstances of illegal invasion..

  from rim lo on Vimeo./span>/center>

Iran Nuclear Deal: 

Donald Trump called the newly-announced Iran nuclear deal "terrible" on Tuesday, saying in an interview with NBC News that the president negotiated the agreement "from desperation."

"First of all, we're giving them billions of dollars in this deal, which we shouldn't have given them. We should have kept the money," he said, appearing to refer to gradual sanctions relief for Iran under the parameters of the deal.

Full article: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-weighs-iran-deal-n391926

The Iran deal represent the scenario of facing America with 2 options: 

Letting Iran get the Bomb or financial explosion.

This is based on the suppositions presented to the mainstream media, nobody knows how far Iran from making the "scary" bomb, and the circumstances, the progress of their enrichments and their nature, but for sure lifting sanctions will boost its budget which is to be used for different purposes.

Here D. Trump present an perspective of the second option; expanding the consequence of the financial explosion caused by lifting sanctions, one common trait shared by successful people, same as Bill Gates for instance is that they tend to be very objective and goal oriented, they get the big picture and even project the expansions, the rest in between is insignificant obstacles that have no sense and may be sacrificed if you aim high, its considered burdens that you just pass through while keeping eye on the ultimate goal, D. Trump in his reflection about the Iran deal as a business man will jump into the consequences of the financial explosion caused by lifting sanctions', Iranians are making trade deals left and right and the financial might can be used in different ways.

American racial structure: defining presidential candidates:

This is not an racially motivated opinion, but lets face it, Obama was voted in for 2 terms by colored people, women with a tiny brain and big ass, and undocumented immigrants or as Trump call them simply illegal immigrants, since there was that ID issue which is really ridiculous.

Obama was voted in because he is advocating more rights and policies for that kind of people called "parasites" that thrives on hard working Americans tax money, even he was crowned as the food stamps president, giving his presidency a legacy of promoting a life style of total dependency on the system laziness and none productivity, which the middle white class payed the price for, collapsing into poverty, while colored on public assistance are living a middle class life on taxes paid by others, to top it all he is planning to legalize millions of undoccc..I mean Illegal immigrants to milk system even more. 

I dont care about his foreign policy since as Lee Puniisher I have a total opposite stand on international affairs, which will contradict my opinions in this post that seems pro decent Americans..I speak the truth, and I will be always lee puniisher as in my cover photo.

Now lets put this in a bigger perspective:

Obama, promoting a social dependency and advocating lazy worthless people with mental limitation to take advantage of the system to the max.

And Donald J. Trump a successful businessman who, upfront expressed opinions and policies business oriented and presenting signs of order and decency instead of chaos and anarchy Obama is advocating. The thing is that the vision Trump presenting for the country is so revolutionary, and challenging to all social structures being put in the country progressively by the Zionist occupied Government (ZOG) decades ago, to make sure a comfortable "integration" of their racial weapon to dilute the white race, and promote America status as "free shit provider".

He has that idealistic image of america that ignore the country racial reality, and mostly it will be colliding with the reality of what generations of making parasites thriving on hard working people money created in peoples minds and public services routines, just look at what happens when a Negros got shot by a cop while caught stealing and presumably armed, the masses are so dumbed down, that their sense of entitlement is ridiculous, and considered a part of the constitution, they still thinking of the reparation as an obligation of the government, so if D. Trump tries to cure the society from parasites thriving on the system for a healthy nation he will be confronted by the enraged masses.

The Remedy: By Lee puniisher

This is my vision of the situation; imagine America without all those parasites, worthless people depending on the system and all those illegals acting like hard workers and shit with a fake smile, will back-stab you at the first chance, imagine American jobs are not exported to China and India, instead average Americans with no to little skills can make a decent living while paying taxes, instead of hiring illegals for 5$/hours to satisfy businesses and Jews greed, imagine the society got rid of all drug traffickers and criminals hanging around unemployed, preying on people in every occasion, Imagine the trillions of dollars that will be saved without public assistance used as full time employment by parasites people, of course a public assistance for really needy, elderly and handicap must prevail, imagine all that money boost of the economy, and how it may be used, to create jobs for people who really want and need to work.

Unfortunately this is an fantasist scenario, representing and idealistic nation, and the reality is far hard and different, unless draconian measures are taken to fix America.

‪#‎MakeAmericaGreatAgain‬ or ‪#‎AmputatetheBadElements‬