The Take Over: Evil Prevails in America

“Obama’s America Is Planet Of Apes”

Glenn Beck compared Obama’s America to “the damn Planet of the Apes,” Thursday during a rant against the president’s praise for the AFL-CIO.

Beck made the comparison while trying to blame union support of strong pensions for the nation’s high unemployment rate. He doesn't like that former SEIU president Andy Stern sits on the president’s panel on deficit reduction.

The racial politics behind 'Planet of the Apes:

From the very beginning of movies, with D.W. Griffith's racist propaganda film The Birth of a Nation there have been racist themes and images in mainstream movies. For much of the 20th century, black audiences endured blackface, coons and with the exception of a few dignified Sidney Poitier roles in the 50s and 60s -- barely any representation at all. When the blaxploitation genre broke through in the 1970s it did give more African-American talent a chance to shine but these films largely glorified violence and crime, as well as brutality towards women.

The original Planet of the Apes, starring screen legend Charlton Heston, released in 1968, served as sort of a cinematic version of John Howard Griffin's 1961 book Black Like Me, where Griffin experienced life as a black man by darkening his skin and reported back on his findings. It's a "what if the shoe was on the other foot?" type scenario where white men experience the type of discrimination usually reserved for black people.

Apes imagined a fictional world 2,000 years in the future where monkeys, gorillas, and other primates take on human features including the sort of racism that the Civil Rights Movement was addressing at the time, only directed at human beings. It's about how power corrupts and can be used unjustly but one isn't always aware of the injustice until they experience it for themselves.

The Rise of the Planet of the Apes, a “re-imagining” of the classic Planet of the Apes movies, prove that the racial politics and stereotypes that have long fueled the franchise and are still very present in Hollywood.

Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement Part 7

This is a series of posts from the cited paper, I will try to divide it into many parts, put titles, and some illustration to fit in blogger and this Blog.

                                                                      From The Journal of Historical Review, Sept.-Oct. 1993 (Vol. 13, No. 5), pages 4-25.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     By Robert Morgan

Growing Clamor for Emancipation

Lincoln's faithful enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law not only filled Washington, DC, jails with runaway slaves waiting to be claimed by their owners, but also enraged many who loathed slavery. In an effort to appease his party's abolitionist faction, Lincoln urged that the United States formally recognize the black republics of Haiti and Liberia, a proposal that Congress accepted.

Lincoln realized that the growing clamor to abolish slavery threatened to seriously jeopardize the support he needed to prosecute the war to preserve the Union. Accordingly, on March 6, 1862, he called on Congress to endorse a carefully worded resolution.

Resolved, that the United States ought to cooperate with any state which may adopt gradual abolishment of slavery, giving to such state pecuniary aid, to be used by such state in its discretion, to compensate for the inconvenience, public and private, produced by such change of system.

Sanctuary States proposed for wanna be freed slaves: 

In a letter to New York Times editor Henry J. Raymond urging support for the resolution, Lincoln explained that one million dollars, or less than a half-day's cost of the war, would buy all the slaves in Delaware, and that $174 million, or less than 87 days' cost of the war, would purchase all the slaves in the border states and the District of Columbia.

Although the resolution lacked authority of law, and was merely a declaration of intent, it alarmed representatives from the loyal slave-holding border states. Missouri Congressman Frank P. Blair, Jr. (who, in 1868, would campaign as the Democratic party's vice presidential candidate) spoke against the resolution in a speech in the House on April 11, 1862. 

Emancipation of the slaves, he warned, would be a terrible mistake until arrangements were first made to resettle the blacks abroad. Blair spoke of shipping them to areas south of the Rio Grande.

In spite of such opposition, though, moderate Republicans and Democrats joined to approve the resolution, which was passed by Congress and signed by Lincoln on April 10, 1862. Not a single border state lawmaker had voted for the measure, however.

In an effort to assuage such concerns, in July Lincoln called border state Congressmen and Senators to a White House meeting at which he explained that the recently-passed resolution involved no claim of federal authority over slavery in the states, and that it left the issue under state control. Seeking to calm fears that emancipation would suddenly result in many freed Negroes in their midst, he again spoke of resettlement of blacks as the solution. "Room in South America for colonization can be obtained cheaply, and in abundance," said the President. "And when numbers shall be large enough to be company and encouragement for one another, the freed people will not be so reluctant to go."

Congress Votes Funds for Resettlement

In 1860, the 3,185 slaves in the District of Columbia were owned by just two percent of the District's residents. In April 1862, Lincoln arranged to have a bill introduced in Congress that would compensate District slave-holders an average of $300 for each slave. An additional $100,000 was appropriated to be expended under the direction of the President of the United States, to aid in the colonization and settlement of such free persons of African descent now residing in said District, including those to be liberated by this act, as may desire to emigrate to the Republic of Haiti or Liberia, or such other country beyond the limits of the United States as the President may determine.

When he signed the bill into law on April 16, Lincoln stated: "I am gratified that the two principles of compensation, and colonization, are both recognized, and practically applied in the act."

Two months later, as part of the (second) Confiscation Act of July 1862, Congress appropriated an additional half-million dollars for the President's use in resettling blacks who came under Union military control. Rejecting criticism from prominent "radicals" such as Senator Charles Sumner, most Senators and Representatives expressed support for the bold project in a joint resolution declaring that the President is hereby authorized to make provision for the transportation, colonization and settlement in some tropical country beyond the limits of the United States, of such persons of African race, made free by the provisions of this act, as may be willing to emigrate ...

Lincoln now had Congressional authority and $600,000 in authorized funds to proceed with his plan for resettlement.

Obstacles

Serious obstacles remained, however. Secretary of the Interior Caleb B. Smith informed the President that Liberia was out of the question as a destination for resettling blacks because of the inhospitable climate, the unwillingness of blacks to travel so far, and the great expense involved in transporting people such a vast distance. Haiti was ruled out because of the low level of civilization there, because Catholic influence was so strong there, and because of fears that the Spanish might soon take control of the Caribbean country. Those blacks who had expressed a desire to emigrate, Secretary Smith went on to explain, preferred to remain in the western hemisphere. The only really acceptable site was Chiriqui, Smith concluded, because of its relative proximity to the United States, and because of the availability of coal there. Meanwhile, the United States minister in Brazil expressed the view that the country's abundance of land and shortage of labor made it a good site for resettling America's blacks.

In mid-May 1862, Lincoln received a paper from Reverend James Mitchell that laid out arguments for resettling the country's black population:

Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may someday challenge the supremacy of the white man.

Mitchell went on to recommend the gradual deportation of America's blacks to Central America and Mexico. 

"That region had once known a great empire and could become one again," he stated. "This continent could then be divided between a race of mixed bloods and Anglo-Americans." 

Lincoln was apparently impressed with Mitchell's arguments. A short time later, he appointed him as his Commissioner of Emigration.

To Secede or not to Secede? that's the question.

As predicted Obama won a  second term, like if there was a doubt on the tournure the country is taking, from the demographic shift to a majority of color to an overall degradation of all the standards and values as a direct consequence to the new composition of the population and the influence of the masses on the American spirit and mentality, making it an example of the degenerate Human being in the 21st century (this remark include African Americans, this post is not to address the evolution issue  and the presence of Homo-Erectus in large numbers in the American society.
In fact, the Influence of Blacks on the overall path America is taking is not to be presented, along with Hispanics  these 2 groups alone can put the value and the standards of any given society decades behind, and boosted by the Zionists controlled media continuing its propaganda of political correctness  diversity and positive discrimination, while the right term to call all these measures is "Divide to rule" as all these policies are shifting the balance and reducing the gap between whites and colored making the latter forming a considerable part in the middle socioeconomic class, and it works just fine, the reelection of Obama thanks to people of colors is just a proof, people start voting even if they never cared about elections before, voting to defeat evil whitey and for a president of color, illegal immigrants did their patriot duty toward la Raza by voting for the Brown president, it is no surprise to find day laborer lining up to vote.

"Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida."
"No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID. Add to this electronic “glitches” that gave Obama votes meant for Romney, and it’s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012. We just became a Third World country."

From: http://www.republicbroadcasting.org

 While divers effort are made to integrate, assimilate and make people of colors productive members and give them a feeling of dignity and equality, often it's rooted from the scare of the past interactions between the White, Black and Brown colors composing the American infrastructure, people of colors will take the first chance to bait the hand that's feeding them, they voted for Obama, just because he is a person of color, the majority  of Obama voters are Women, Black and Hispanics, surprised? you shouldn't be. As a Black man he naturally lured the vote of American women, as a person of color, and necessarily for his "immigration reform" he is the Browns hope for a successful Reconquista. And as branded the "Welfare president" for his extensive and never seen before hand out records, knowing the ridiculous dependency of African Americans on the federal Aid, he got the vote of Blacks, Blacks who hated Bush, but had to choose another whitey before, now, with the option of a president of color, they cant be happier, they wont think twice, a white president give the the impression that the masta is still ruling them, and the subordination feeling  originating from the scare of slavery, stored somewhere deep inside their subconsciousness as a Black person in a slave and master founded America, this feeling is smoothen by the bureaucratic procedures soothing the bitterness of being slave descendant in America, with a president of color they feel, it's a huge step toward improving their situation and the segregation they still feeling sometimes as evil whitey putting them down and sheet...,
Of course, they close their eyes, or look the other way to ignore the fact that Obama's father is from west Africa, not slave descendant, a cross breed with a white American. Native west Africans who sold their African Americans ancestors into slavery, but they don't want nobody to disturb their sweet dream..."we be in the White House and sheeet".
He looks like a person of color, they don't care about his family tree...it may lead to a slave merchant in west Africa...Michelle already knows her masta ancestor, still she will never want to find out the plantation address.


Who comes first Secession or Decline?

As a spontaneous reaction, the stupid masses opened their eyes...oops: Yeah, finally the stupid masses start opening their eyes lol  had to be ruled by a president of color for two successive terms to feel the threat..And here is the secession fever hitting the country leaded with Texas the lone star state.
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/theend.htm 

...The white house is ruled by a person of color and the government is controlled by Zionists who worked hard during the last 3 or 4 decades to get to this situation of demographic shift and genetic dilution of whites, making them tending to be a minority in the decisional perspective, even the major part of whites are too brainwashed and they developed a horrible sense of self-hate, they are not even aware of the situation and of the path their overall race is taking, which may be described as a snowball slowly rolling down a curve, since most of them are stuck in their little milieu as stupid Americans, and this has been going on since generations, so now, they feel they are normal, and so great, and that's what it is an American and the great American culture.

That said, this secession fever which reflect an global awakening of the masses, and it has to be caused by a major event of the size of the presidential election-too stupid, naive and brainwashed to have figured out the tendency of their situation and destiny, without a major event- it may be considered as a positive sign, or as a time to take tough decisions: Secede or Collapse?

By M. TaMere
TaMere Network
Founder and President.

Abstract from:  

Secession movement recalls ugly past

From: http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/nov/25/secession-movement-recalls-ugly-past/

More than 700,000 people in all 50 states have signed petitions asking the White House for peaceful secession from the United States. Texas has by far the most signatures -- more than 100,000. (Gov. Rick Perry raised the specter of secession a few years ago, though he has distanced himself from the current campaign.)

This latest effort to secede from the Union is an eerie reminder of slavery, the Confederacy, and the Civil War. And the current one stems, in large part, from similar sentiments. Many Americans simply cannot accept that we have a black man in the White House. Nor can they accept the demographic shift in this country away from a white majority.

                          

As the numerical majority of Americans, European-Americans have been the face of the United States for more than 200 years. Their values were the country's values. Their politics and economic policies were the nation's policies. Every president was a white male.

Obama did not win the majority of the votes cast by white people in either of his victories. His victories represent the seismic flexing of the power of a new coalition.

Superiority threat
This new majority of voters scares the willies out of many conservatives. They should be scared. This new coalition is not only taking power away from them, it's threatening their sense of white superiority and white entitlement.
You get a sense of that in the mountains of disrespect that they heap upon Obama.
You get a sense of that in Mitt Romney's post-election comments that Obama bought the votes of blacks, Latinos and young people.
You get a sense of that in Bill O'Reilly's lament that the "white establishment" is the minority now. "It's a changing country, the demographics are changing," O'Reilly said, by way of explaining Romney's defeat.